[OPE-L:1729] Petty Commodity Production

=?EUC-KR?B?sOa/tbTrx9AgsbO89sD8u+q9xw==? (conlee@chonnam.chonnam.ac.kr)
Tue, 9 Apr 1996 03:42:24 -0700

[ show plain text ]

------ =_NextPart_000_01BB2648.17F42E40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


------ =_NextPart_000_01BB2648.17F42E40
Content-Type: text/plain; name="tempas.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=BA=B8=B3=BD=C0=CC: =B0=E6=BF=B5=B4=EB=C7=D0 =
=B1=B3=BC=F6=C0=FC=BB=EA=BD=C7
=BA=B8=B3=BD =B3=AF=C2=A5: 1996=B3=E2 4=BF=F9 9=C0=CF =
=C8=AD=BF=E4=C0=CF =BF=C0=C8=C4 6:42
=B9=DE=B4=C2=C0=CC: 'ope-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu'
=C1=A6=B8=F1: RE: [OPE-L:1718] Re: =20

Chai-on said:
-------
No. PCP cannot be a dominating mode of production in a social formation
because commodity exchange is to be ruled by a certain social process=20
which
determines the reduction coefficient of heterogeneous to homogeneous=20
labors.
A dominating mode of production determines the frame of reference for =
the
reduction of skilled, complex labors to unskilled, simple ones.
=20
Paul replied:
-----
It all depends what you mean by dominant. Your definition seems
too specific to commodity production. In discussing the transintion
from slavery to feudalism under the colonate would your definition=20
apply? I think not.
By dominant I meant simply that it employed the greater
part of the social labour.

Chai-on rereplies:
-----------------
The terminology of "Dominant" should not follow ** the demographic =
majority rule.** The point is the relationship between distinct modes =
of production. PCP cannot rule other modes of production on account of =
its own weak point. The weak point is this: commodity production =
requires a reduction principle of skilled, complex labors to unskilled, =
simple ones. The reduction principle, according to Marx, is determined =
by a social process. IMO, the social process is the frame of reference =
derived from other mode of production, not from pcp's own mode of =
production. It is to be imposed from without. =20

One more point towards Paul's position;

I should reject such a demographic majority rule. The commanders are of =
course of the minority but they rule dominantly the majority. The =
qualitative relationship between different modes of production is to be =
investigated. Today, electoronic industry is dominant but is still =
employing relatively small portion of the existent labor-powers. =20

Cheers,

Chai-on
------ =_NextPart_000_01BB2648.17F42E40--