Andrew writes:
their [commodities'] commonality is
not created, determined, or whatever IN in act of exchange, but rather
the reverse. The act of excahnge depends on and presupposes their
commonality
Michael W. asks:
Could this (for you, although not for Marx) include the possibility that
commodities' commonality consists only in their location in a persistent
systematic and systemic structure of commodity exchanges?
Andrew:
Now [under cmp] they are commodities already in the process of production,
since
they are produced as commodities.
Michael:
Could this not be only because capitalist production involves speculative
precommensuration, in the expectation of producing usccessful commodities
(which, of course, is faciltated by the systemic 'commonality' suggested above)?
Michael