Andrew wrote in [OPE-L:3102]:
> If you want to discuss it with me, I suggest we return to the point where
> *you* broke that discussion off.
I did *not* break the discussion off. You did in #3081 when you refused to
answer the substantive points that I had made in #3079. Those points in
#3079 have still not been answered -- something you acknowledged in #3081.
> As I have noted in recent days, that point was where I claimed that if
> the whole working day is appropriated by capital, as Marx assumed at
> one point, then necessary labor equals 0 *and* v = 0. What
> is your response?
My response was given in #3070. I am also claiming now that Marx did not
assume necessary labor or v = 0.
In OPE-L Solidarity,
Jerry