Re:
> Steve: "It takes 2 sectors to develop the critique of simultaneous valuation,
> which is why I don't see that a one-sector TSS is significant."
>
> Huh? Why does it take 2 sectors?
I should have said Sraffian critique--in which I'm more interested than
Okishio.
I'd better add here and now that my work is in the TSS mould, with one
exception--it doesn't assume the labor theory of value. And I'm using it
to critique Sraffian economics for precisely the same reason you
critique what you call the simultaneist interpretation of Marx.
Cheers,
Steve