Steve K wrote in [OPE-L:3462]:
> Jerry's suggestion is a good one, but I'm afraid I've "jumped the gun"
> on it to some extent, since I've constructed a Kaleckian version of
> this:
[Well ... who can resist an offer like this?]
By all means, show us your disequilibrium dynamic model.
If you would be so kind so as to explain the reasoning behind the
assumptions, sectors, and characteristics of the model, that might make a
good start for discussion.
BTW, of the different variables and topics that I itemized, which ones are
*not* included.
[I'm always willing to learn some more ... even from a Post-Keynesian].
In Solidarity,
Jerry