[OPE-L:3643] Re: "Labor Theory of Value"--not used by Marx!

Michael Perelman (michael@ecst.csuchico.edu)
Sat, 9 Nov 1996 09:04:12 -0800 (PST)

[ show plain text ]

Netscape allows you to search the individual files, but not the whole
site.
>
> Michael, as far as I can tell word searching is not available on the site
> below. Paul
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 1996, Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> > This website has Smith, Ricardo and much more.
> >
> > http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca:80/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
> >
> > Paul Zarembka wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul, Is there a Web cite where we can word search Smith and Ricardo? You
> > > make an interesting suggestion. Paul Z.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 8 Nov 1996, Paul Cockshott wrote:
> > >
> > > > The fact that the term labour theory of value is not used in Marx
> > > > is hardly significant. Do Smith or Ricardo use the phrase either?
> > > > It is a label applied retrospectively to distinguish these thinkers
> > > > from those who came after who had a utility theory of value. One
> > > > can hardly expect them to have had the foresight to distinguish
> > > > themselves from an as yet uninvented theory.
> > > > Paul Cockshott
> >
> > --
> > Michael Perelman
> > Economics Department
> > California State University
> > Chico, CA 95929
> >
> > Tel. 916-898-5321
> > E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu
> >
>
>

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 916-898-5321 E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu