because no value-form analysts have replied to Jerry's following enquiry,
>while value is "created" in production by [socially-necessary] labor, the
>magnitude of value can be *diminished* in the sphere of circulation prior
>to final exchange, but that
>value can't be *increased* in the aggregate by the *act* of exchange,
>what then is the difference between the above and the value-form
>interpretation?
>
>In solidarity, Jerry
>
Chai-on, though he is an opponent to the value-form analysis, writes on
behalf of them
In value form analysis, the mag. of value can be increased by the act of
exchange. This is a big difference from the Jerry's IMO.
Chai-on