In message Thu, 22 May 1997 10:18:19 -0700 (PDT),
Michael Williams <mwilliam@compuserve.com> writes:
> Michael L. wrote ( in the middle of a long and eloquent post
>
>> (I think this group would include--- although I'm wary both of
>> misrepresenting a position and also leaving someone out--- Jerry,
>> Michael
> W,
>
>> Michael P, Duncan, Riccardo and Alejandro R; and they've stated the
>> above much better and more precisely than I have.)
>>
>
> I am happy to be included in this group, but have not managed to state the
> PIP position anywhere near as clearly and concisely as Michael L. does
> here.
>
> Michael
Thanks for your generous comment, Michael. I'll accept that I was concise,
but what I really wanted to convey is that my statement of the PIP position
was also quite derivative. Incidentally, I think de Vroey's essay was the
first that I can recall presenting this argument.
in solidarity,
mike
-----------------------
Michael A. Lebowitz
Economics Department, Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C. Canada V5A 1S6
Office (604) 291-4669; Office fax: (604) 291-5944
Home: (604) 872-0494; Home fax (with warning): (604) 872-0485
Lasqueti Island (250) 333-8810