*******************
Re: living-labour and variable capital
Since we're talking about variable capital, I would be interested in
hearing what others think about the treatment of "non-capital" in
_Capital_. E.g. what does the above suggest about the archiotronic
structure of _Capital_ and the extent to which the "negation of capital"
is (or is not) explicitly discussed as a subject in its own right?
In solidarity, Jerry