>So what should we do about Paul C's proposal that we sponsor an on-line
>journal?
>
>Since no one has actually said that we shouldn't sponsor a journal, why
>can't we go ahead with at least the preparatory work needed to publish a
>journal? (E.g. a site has to be selected, a format chosen, guidelines
>have to be suggested, etc.)
>
>My suggestion is that a sub-committee be formed of all those who are
>willing to *work* on putting the journal together and that, where and
>when appropriate, they report back to us (OPE-L) on how they are doing.
>I.e. why can't we agree in principle on having a journal, but discuss
>later any proposals re journal structure by the sub-committee?
>
>Sound good?
>
>In solidarity, Jerry
>