Jurriaan Bendien wrote:
> Dear Ajit,
>
> Your write:
>
> I think Marxist
> >economic theory will not make much progress until we are clear about a
> couple of
> >questions: why Marxist theory needs a theory of value, and what question a
> theory
> >of value is supposed to answer.
>
> Are you clear about it ? If so, can you specify why you think Marxist
> theory needs a theory of value, and what question a theory of value is
> supposed to answer ? Or else, can you supply refernces to your basic point
> of view ?
_______________
I think my response to Paul C. would be a good point to start a discussion. I
would be happy if you take a look at couple of my papers:
'A Critique of *Capital* vol. one: The Value Controversy Revisited', *Research
in Political Economy* vol 16, 1996, (eds.) Paul Zarembka and Ajit Sinha
'The Transformation Problem: Is the Standard Commodity a Solution', Forthcoming
in *RRPE*
A short piece on 'Labour Theory of Value', forthcoming in *Readers Guide to
Social Sciences* could also be helpful. Cheers, ajit sinha
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Jurriaan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 27 2000 - 15:27:08 EST