[OPE-L:1914] Re: Re: value form theory

clyder (wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk)
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:51:53 -0000

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: clyder: "[OPE-L:1915] Re: value-form theories"
• Previous message: clyder: "[OPE-L:1913] Re: Stock and flow measures of the profit rate"
• In reply to: P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk: "[OPE-L:1884] Stock and flow measures of the profit rate"

>
> Maybe Andy and I are just using "exist independently" in two different
> ways, to wit:
>
> 1. abstract labor can exist without the simultaneous existence of money.
>
> 2. abstract labor cannot exist without the simultaneous existence of
> money, but nonetheless abstract labor EXISTS AS A SEPARATE ENTITY from
> money (as a "ghostly objectivity").

 My use would be meaning 1.

• Next message: clyder: "[OPE-L:1915] Re: value-form theories"
• Previous message: clyder: "[OPE-L:1913] Re: Stock and flow measures of the profit rate"
• In reply to: P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk: "[OPE-L:1884] Stock and flow measures of the profit rate"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Dec 19 1999 - 11:17:56 EST