Aalberg, T., & Jenssen, A. T. (2007). Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates. NORDICOM Review, 28, 17-32.

Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630.

Abramowitz, A. L. (1989). Viability, electability, and candidate choice in a presidential primary election: A test of competing models. Journal of Politics, 51, 977-992.

Ahlering, R. F. (1987). Need for cognition, attitudes, and the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 100-102.

Ahlering, R. F. (1987). Predicting voting choice from within-versus across-subject attitudes. Journal of Psychology, 121, 623-627.

Aldrich, J. H., Sullivan, J. A., & Borgida, E. (1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates "waltz before a blind audience?" American Political Science Review, 83, 123-141.

Anderson, J. A., & Avery, R. K. (1978). An analysis of changes in voter perception of candidate's positions. Communication Monographs, 45, 354-361.

Anderson, P. A., & Kibler, R. J. (1978). Candidate valence as a predictor of voter preference. Human Communication Research, 5, 4-14.

Anderson, R. O. (1973). The characterization model for rhetorical criticism of political image campaigns. Journal of Western Speech, 37, 75-86.

Antczak, F. J., & Stuckey, M. E. (1995). The battle of issues and images: Establishing interpretive dominance. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Presidential campaign discourse (pp. 117-134). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Atkin, C. K. (1981). Political campaigns: Mass communication and persuasion. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion: New directions in theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Austin, E. W., & Pinkleton, B. E. (2001). The role of parental mediation in the political socialization process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 221-240.

Aylor, B. (1999). Source credibility and presidential candidates in 1996: The changing nature of character and empathy evaluations. Communication Research Reports, 16, 296-304.

Bailenson, J. N., Garland, J., Iyengar, S., and Yee, N. (2005). Transformed facial similarity as a political cue: A preliminary investigation. Political Communication Lab, Stanford. http://pcl.stanford.edu/

Bartels, L. (1985). Expectations and preferences in presidential nominating campaigns. American Political Science Review, 79, 804-815.

Bassili, J. N. (1995).Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 686-695.

Beck. P. A. (1991). Voters' intermediation environments in the 1988 presidential contest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 371-394.

Benders, D. A., & Fabj, V. (1994). Perceived control and the Clinton Presidency: Political discourse in an alienated age. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 211-224.

Beniger, J. R. (1990). Changing technologies, mass media, and control of the pictures in people's heads: A preliminary look at U.S. presidential campaign slogans, 1800-1984. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 149-169), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006). Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis. Journal of Politics, 68, 640–656.

Bennett, W. L. (1981). Perception and cognition: An information processing framework for politics. In S. Long (Ed.), The handbook of political behavior, Vol.1. New York: Plenum Press.

Benoit, W. L., & McHale, J. P. (2004). Presidential candidates' personal qualities: Computer content analysis. Presidential candidate images (pp. 49-63). In K. L. Hacker (Ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Benoit, W. L., & McHale, J. P. (2003). Presidential candidates' television spots and personal qualities. Southern Communication Journal, 68, 319-334.

Berent, M. K., & Krosnick, J. K. (1995). The relation between political attitude importance and knowledge structure. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 91-109). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., & Tuchfarber, J. J. (1982). Political information processing: Questions order and context effects. Political Behavior, 4, 177-200.

Blais, A., Nevitte, N., Gidengil, E., Nadeau, R. (2000). Do people have feelings toward leaders about whom they say they know nothing about. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 452-463.

Bolland, J. M. (1985). The structure of political cognition: A new approach to its meaning and measurement. Political Behavior, 7, 248-265.

Books, J. W., & Prysby, C. L. (1991). Political behavior and the local context. Praeger.

Bowes, J. E., & Strentz, H. (1978). Candidate images: Stereotyping and the 1976 debates. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2 (pp. 391-406). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Brady, H. E., & Sniderman, P. M. (1985). Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning. American Political Science Review, 79, 1061-78.

Brent, E. & Granberg, D. (1982). Subjective agreement with the presidential candidates of 1976 and 1980. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 393-403.

Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, values words, and citizens' explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19, 303-316.

Boynton G. R. (1995). Computational modeling: A computational model of a survey respondent. In M. Lodge & McGraw, G. R. (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Boynton, G. R., & Lodge, M. (1994). Voter’s image of candidates. In A. H. Miller & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and America's self images (pp. 176-189). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Brody, R. A., Page, B. I. (1973). Indifference, alienation and rational decisions: The effects of candidate evaluations on turnout and the vote. Public Choice, 15, 1-17.

Buchanan, B. (1988). Sizing up candidates. PS: Political Science and Politics, 21, 263-268.

Bucy, E. (2000). Emotional and evaluative consequences of inappropriate leader displays. Communication Research, 27, 194-226.

Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (1999). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: processing televised reactions to news. Journal of Communication, 49, 59-79.

Bucy, E. P., & Bradley, S. D. (2004). Presidential expression and viewer emotion: Counterempathic responses to televised leader displays. Social Science Information, 43, 59–94.

Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (1999). The micro- and Macrodrama of politics on television: Effects of media format on candidate evaluations. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 193-210.

Carlson, J. M., & Dolan, K. (1985). The waffle phenomenon and candidates’ image. Psychological Reports, 57, 795-798.

Carlson, R., & Brincka, J. (1987). Studies in script theory: III. Ideology and political imagination. Political Psychology, 8, 563-574.

Chaffee, S. H., & Miyo, Y. (1983). Selective exposure and the reinforcement hypothesis: An intergenerational panel study of the 1980 presidential campaign. Communication Research, 10, 3-36.

Christ, W. G. (1985). Voter preference and emotion: Using emotional response to classify decided and undecided voters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 237-254.

Cobb, M. C., Brendan Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2012). Beliefs don't always persevere: How political figures are punished when positive information about them is discredited. Political Psychology. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00934.x/abstract

Conover, P. J. (1981). Political cues and the perception of candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 9, 427-448.

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1980). Belief system organization in the American electorate: An alternative approach. In J. C. Pierce & J. L. Sullivan (Eds). The electorate reconsidered. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645.

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95-123.

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 50-78.

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). The role of inference in the perception of political candidates. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 127-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912-940.

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.

Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D. Kane, J G. (1999). The structure of political competition: Dimensions of candidate and group evaluation revisited. Political Behavior, 21, . 283-304

Crigler, A. N. (Ed.) The psychology of political communication. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.

Cundy, D. T. (1994). Televised news, trait inferences, and support for political figures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic media, 38, 49-63.

Cundy, D. T. (1989). Televised political editorials and the low-involvement viewer. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 911- .

Cundy, D. T. (1979). Affect, cue-giving and political attitude formation: Survey evidence in support of a social conditioning interpretation. Journal of Politics, 41, 75-105.

Dimock, M. A., & Popkin, S. L. (1997). Political knowledge in comparative perspective. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.) Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America (pp. 217-224). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

Dolan, K. A., & Holbrook, T. M. (2001). Knowing versus caring: The role of affect and cognition in political perception. Political Psychology, 22, 27-44.

Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 51-74.

Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. (1998). "Moral referendums": Values, news media, and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication, 15, 301-321.

Douglas, J. (1972). The verbal image: Student perceptions of political figures. Speech monographs, 39, 1-15.

Domke, D., & Shah, D. V. (1995). Interpretation of issues and voter decision-making strategies: A new perceptive on :issue-oriented" election coverage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 45-71.

Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B.(1998). "Moral referendums": Values, news media, and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication, 15, 301-321.

Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A. (1998). Perceptions of a media campaign: The role of social identity and the changing intergroup context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 3-16.

Elliott, W. R., & Sothirajah, J. (1993). Post-debate analysis and media reliance: Influences on candidate image and voting probabilities. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 321-335.

Entman, R. M. (1994). Representation and reality in the portrayal of Blacks on network television news. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 509-520.

Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.

Ferejohn, J. A., & Kuklinski, J. H. (Eds). (1990). Information and democratic processes. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois Press.

Finn, S. (1987). Electoral information flow and students' information processing: A computerized panel study. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 517-532). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.

Fiske, S. T., & Kinder, D. R. (1981). Involvement, expertise, and schema use: Evidence from political cognition. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fiske, S. T., Kinder, D. R., & Larter, W. M. (1983). The novice and the expert: knowledge-based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 381-400.

Fredin, E. S., Kosicki, G. M., & Becker, L. B. (1996). Cognitive strategies for media use during a presidential campaign. Political Communication, 13, 23-42

Funk, C. L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation, Journal of Politics, 61, 700-720.

Gant, M. M. (1983). Citizens' evaluation of the 1980 presidential candidates: Influence on campaign strategy. American Politics Quarterly, 11, 327-348.

Garramone, G. M. (1985). Motivation and political information processing: Extending the gratification approach. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 201-219). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Garramone, G. M. (1986). Candidate image formation: The role of information processing. In L. L. Kaid, D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), New perspectives on political advertising (pp. 325-247). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. P. (1999). Increasing sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication, 16, 3-23.

Gilens, M. (1996b). "Race coding" and White opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90, 593-604.

Glass, D. P. (1985). Evaluating presidential candidates: Who focuses on their personal qualities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 517-534.

Golden, J. L. (1997). The issue character in the presidential contest of 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 994-1000.

Graber, D. A. (2001). Processing politics: Leaning from television in the Internet age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Graber, D. A. (1996). Whither research on the psychology of political communication. In A. N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication (pp. 211-224). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Graber, D. A. (1994). Why voters fail information tests: Can the hurdles be overcome? Political Communication, 11, 331-346.

Graber, D. A. (1989). An information processing approach to public opinion analysis. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds), Rethinking communication, Volume 2 Paradigm exemplars (pp. 103-116). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman.

Graber, D. (1972). Personal qualities in presidential images: The contribution of the press. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 16, 46-76.

Granberg, D., & Brent. E. (1980). Perceptions of issue positions of Presidential candidates. American Scientist, 68, 617-625.

Granberg, D., & Brown, T. A. (1989). On affect and cognition in politics. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 171-183.

Granberg, D., Harris, W., & King, M. (1981). Assimilation but little contrast in the 1976 U. S. Presidential election. Journal of Psychology, 108, 241-247.

Grandjean, B. D., & Proffitt, J. M. (2001). Political communication and statistical interaction: Reexamining issue, image, involvement, and interpersonal conversation. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 455-464.

Hacker, K. L. (Ed.) (2004). Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hacker, K. L. (2004). A duel-processing perspective of candidate image formation (pp. 105-132). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hacker, K. L. (2004). Introduction: The continued importance of the candidate image construct (pp. 1-19). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hacker, K. L. (2004). Using cognitive measures for analysis of candidate images (pp. 211-229). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hacker, K. L. (Ed.) (1995). Candidate images in presidential elections. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hacker, K. L. (1995). Interpersonal communication and the construction of candidate images. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 65-82), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hacker, K. L. (1995). Linguistic discourse analysis of candidate image formulation. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 153-162), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hacker, K. L., Freedman, E. G., & Bergvall, V. (1990, June). Discourse formulations and cognitive representations of George Bush and Michael Dukakis: A discourse analysis of voters' constructions of political images in 1988. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association. Dublin, Ireland.

Hacker, K. L., Zakahi, W. R., Giles, M. J., & McQuitty, S. (2000). Components of candidate images: Statistical analysis of the issue-persona dichotomy in the presidential campaign of 1966. Communication Monographs, 67, 227-238.

Hanson, D. J. (1989). Authoritarianism and candidate preference in the 1988 presidential election. Psychological Reports, 64, 914-.

Harrison, T. M., Stephen, T. D., Husson, W., & Fehr, B. J. (1991). Images versus issues in the 1984 presidential election: Differences between men and women. Human Communication Research, 18, 209-227.

Hellweg, S. A. (1995). Campaign and candidate images in American presidential elections. In K. Hacker (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 1-17). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hellweg, S. A. (1979). An examination of voter conceptualizations of the ideal political candidate. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 44, 373-385.

Hellweg, S. A., Dionisiopoulos, G. N., & Kugler, D. B. (1989). Political candidate image: A state-of-the-art review. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.). Progress in communication Sciences, Vol. 9 (pp. 43-78). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hellweg, S. A., & King, S. W. (1983). Comparative evaluation of political candidates: Implications for the voter decision-making process. Central States Speech Journal, 34, 134-138.

Hellweg, S. A., King, S. W., & Williams, S. E. (1988). Comparative candidate evaluation as a function of election level and candidate incumbency. Communication Reports, 1, 76-85.

Hellweg, S. A., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2004). Meta-analysis of presidential candidate images (pp. 197-209). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hellweg, S. A., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1995). Meta-analysis of candidate images. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 123-130), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hellweg, S. A., & Williams, S. E. (1986, May). Comparative candidate evaluation as a function of election level and candidate incumbency. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association. Chicago, Illinois.

Hetherington, M. J. (1996). The media's role in forming voters' national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 372-395.

Hillygus, D. S., & Shieds, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Holbrook, A. L., Drosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., Gardner, W. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). American Journal of Political Science, 45, 930-950.

Holian, D. B., & Prysby, C. (2014). Candidate character traits in the 2012 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 44, 484–505.

Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375-401.

Husson, W., Stephen, T., Harrison, T. M., & Fehr, B. J. (1988). An interpersonal communication perspective on images of political candidates. Human Communication Research, 14, 397-421.

Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Drosnik, J. A. (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 778-787.

Jacobson, G. C. (2012). The president's effect on partisan attitudes. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42. 683–718.

Jamieson, K. H., Hagen, M. G., Orr, D., Sillaman, L., Morse, S., & Kirn, K (2000). What did the leading candidates say, and did it matter? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 572, 12-16.

Jennings, K. M. (1996). Political knowledge over time and across generations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 228-252.

Johnston, D. (1989). Image and issue political information: Message content or interpretation? Journalism Quarterly, 66, 397-382.

Judd, C. M., & Downing, J. W. (1995). Stereotypic accuracy in judgments of the political positions of groups and individuals. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 65-89). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Judd, C. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 99-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., & Neuman, W. R. (1996). In A. N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication (pp. 133-148). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Kaid, L. L. (2004. Measuring candidate images with semantic differentials (pp. 231-235). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Kaid, L. L. (1995). Measuring candidate images with semantic differentials. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 131-124), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Kaid, L. L. (1977). The neglected candidate: Interpersonal communication in political campaigns. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 4, 245-252.

Kaid, L. L., & Hirsch, R. O. (1973). Selective exposure and candidate image: A field study over time. Central States Speech Journal, 24, 48-51.

Keeter, S. (1987). The illusion of intimacy: Television and the role of candidate personal qualities in voter choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 344-357.

Kendall, K. E., & Paine, S. C. (1995). Political images and voting decisions. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 19-36), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Kendall, K. E., & Yum, J. O. (1984). Persuading the blue-collar voter: Issues, images, and homophily. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 8 (pp. 707-722). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Kennamer, J. D., & Chaffee, S. H. (1982). Communication of political information during early presidential primaries: Cognition, affect, and uncertainty. In M. Burgoon (Ed.). Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 627-650). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Kenney, P. J. (1993). An examination of how voters form impressions of candidates' issue positions during the nomination campaign. Political Behavior, 15, 265- .

Kenski, K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). Issue knowledge and perceptions of agreement in the 2004 presidential general election Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 243-259.

Kimsey, W. D., & Atwood, L. E. (1979). A path analysis of political cognitions and attitudes, communication and voting in a congressional campaign. Communication Monographs, 46, 219-230.

Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau and D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political Cognition (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kinder, D. (1978). Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of presidential candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 859-871.

Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., Abelson, R. P., & Fiske, S. T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior, 4, 315-337.

Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P., & Ban, H. (1999). Candidate Image Attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26, 414-428.

Kjeldahl, W. O., Carmichael, C. W., & Mertz, R. J. (1971). Factors in a presidential candidate's image. Speech Monographs, 38, 129-131.

Klein, J. G. (1996). Negativity in impressions of presidential candidates revisited: The 1992 election. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 288-295.

Knight, K. (1984). The dimensionality of partisan and ideological affect: The influence of positivity. American Politics Quarterly, 12, 305-334.

Knoke, D. (1979). Stratification and the dimensions of American political orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 772-791.

Koch, J. W. (1999). Candidate gender and assessments of Senate candidates. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 84-96.

Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 69-83), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kraus, S. (Ed.) (1990). Mass Communication and political information processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kraus, S., Perloff, R. M. (Eds.) (1985). Mass media and political thought: Information processing approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196-210.

Krosnick, J. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 240-255.

Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K., & Boninger, D. S. (1994). Pockets of responsibility in the American electorate: Findings of a research program on attitude importance. Political Communication, 11,391-411.

Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.

Kruse, D., & Kendall, K. E. (1995). A Rashomonian approach to the study of image construction. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 145-152), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Kuklinski, J. H., & Hurley, N. L. (1994). On hearing and interpreting political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking. Journal of Politics, 56, 729-751.

Kuklinski, J. H., Luskin, R. C., & Bolland, J. (1991). Where is the schema? Going beyond the 'S' work in political psychology. American Political Science Review, 85, 1341-1356.

Kuklinski, J. H,, Ottati, E., Ottati, V, Schwarz, N., & Wyer, R. S. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1-27.

Kuklinski, J. H., & Sigelman, L. (1992). When objectivity is not objective: Network television news coverage of U. S. senators and the "paradox of objectivity", Journal of Politics, 54, 810-833.

Lanzetta, J. T., Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., & McHugo, G. J. (1985). Viewers' emotional and cognitive responses to televised images of political leaders. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information processing approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lau, R. R. (1995). Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a processing-tracing methodology for political scientists. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 179-205). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Lau, R. R. (1989). Construct accessibility and electoral choice. Political Behavior, 11, 5-32.

Lau, R. R. (1986). Political schemata: candidate evaluations and voting behavior. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political Cognition: The 19th annual Carnegie Symposium on cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lau, R. R. (1982). Negativity in political perception. Political Behavior, 4, 353-377.

Lau, R. R., & Erber, R. (1985). Political sophistication: An information-processing perspective. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought (pp. 37-64). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2007). How Voters Decide: Information Processing during Election Campaigns. Political Psychology, 28, 641–644.

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk (2006).How voters decie: Information processing during election campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951-971.

Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (1986). Political cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lee, G., & Cappella, J. N. (2001). The effects of political talk radio on political attitude formation: Exposure versus knowledge. Political Communication, 18, 369-394.

Lenart, S. (1994). Shaping political attitudes: The impact of interpersonal communication and mass media. Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.

Lockerbie, B. (1991). The influence of levels of information on the use of prospective evaluations. Political Behavior, 13, 223-235.

Lodge, M. (1995). Toward a procedural model of candidate evaluation. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 111-139). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Lodge, M., & Hamill, R. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review, 80, 505-519.

Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1993). Inside the mental voting booth: An impression-driven process model of candidate evaluation. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 225-263.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Lodge, M, McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-419.

Lodge, M., Stroh, R., & Wahlke, J. (1990). Black-box models of candidate evaluation. Political Behavior, 12, 5-18.

Louden, A. D. (1994). Voter rationality and media excess: Image in the 1992 presidential campaign. In R. E. Denton (Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 169-187). Westport CT: Praeger.

Louden, A. D. (1987-88). Schematic processing and political advertising. The Carolina Speech Communication Annual, 3-4, 59-84.

Louden, A. D., & McCauliff, K. (2004). The “Authentic Candidate”: Extending candidate image assessment. Presidential Candidate Images (pp. 85-103), In K. L. Hacker (Ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield, Publisher.

Lusk, C. M., & Judd, C. M. (1988). Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24,105-126.

Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. American Political Science Review, 86, 390-.

Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., Popkin, S. L. (2000). Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, W, & Schb, J. M. (1992). Ideology and candidate evaluation in the 1984 and 1988 presidential elections. The Journal of Politics, 54, 573+.

Mansfield, J. (1990). Self-interest in political life. Political Theory, 18, 132-153.

Marcus. G. E. (1991). Emotions and politics: Hot cognitions and the rediscovery of passion. Social Science Information, 30, 195-232.

Marcus, G. E. (1988). The structure of emotional response: 1984 presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 82, 737-761.

Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Artificial intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Markus, G. B. (1986). Stability and change in political attitudes: Observed, recalled, and "explained." Political Behavior, 8, 21-44.

Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73, 617-632.

Markus, G. B., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 672-685.

Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L.,  Theiss-Morse, E. &  Stevens, D. (2005). The emotional foundation of political cognition: The impact of extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26, 949-964.

Marshall, T. R. (1983). Evaluating presidential nominees: Opinion polls, issues and personalities. Western Political Quarterly, 36, 650-659.

Marshall, T. R. (1984). Issues, personalities, and presidential primary voters. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 750-760.

Masters, R. D., & Carlotti, S. J. (1994). Gender differences in responses to political leaders. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality, Vol. II. (pp. 13-26). Boulder, CO: Praeger.

Masters, R. D. , & Sullivan, D. G. (1989). Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior, 11, 123-156.

Masters, R. D. , & Sullivan, D. G. (1989). Facial displays and political leadership in France. Behavioral Processes, 19, 1-30.

Masters, R. D. , & Sullivan, D. G. (1993). Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political attitudes. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 150-182). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Feola, A., & McHugo, G. J. (1987). Television coverage of candidates' display behavior during the 1984 Democratic primaries. International Political Science Review, 8, 121-130.

Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Lanzetta, J. T., McHugo, G. J., & Englis, B. G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethnology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 9, 319-343.

Matthes, J., & Schemer, C. (2012). Diachronic framing effects in competitive opinion environments. Political Communication, 29, 319–339.

McCann, J. A. (1990). Changing electoral contexts and changing candidate images during the 1984 presidential campaign. American Politics Quarterly, 18, 123-140.

McCann, S. J. H. (1997). Threatening times and the election of charismatic U.S. presidents: with and without FDR. Journal of Psychology, 131, 393-400.

McDermott, M. L. (2005). Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. Journal of Politics, 67, 201-219.

McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revising assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication, 19, 281-301.

McGraw, K. M., Hasecke, E., & Conger, K. (2003). Ambivalence, uncertainty, and processes of candidate evaluation. Political Psychology, 24, 421-448.

McGraw, K. M., & Ling, C. (2003). Media priming of presidential and group evaluations. Political Communication, 20, 23-40.

McGraw, K. M., & Steenbergen, M. (1995). Pictures in the head: Memory representations of political candidates. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 15-41). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 41-58.

McGraw, K. M., Pinney, N, & Neumann (1991). Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Political Behavior, 13, 165-189.

McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., & Bush, L. (1991). The effect of attitude on emotional reactions to expressive displays of political leaders. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 19-41.

McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., & English, B. G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1513-1529.

McLeod, J. M., Glynn, C. J., & McDonald, D. G. (1983). Issues and images: Influence on media reliance on voting decisions. Communication Research, 10, 37-58.

Mefford, D. (1990). Case-based reasoning, legal reasoning, and the study of politics. Political Behavior, 12, 125-158.

Mendlesohn, H. (1990). Mind, affect, and action: Construction theory and the media effects dialectic. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 37-45), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Miller, A. H. (1993). Economic, character, and social issues in the 1992 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 315-327.

Miller, A. H. (1986). Partisan cognitions in transition. In R. R Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1985). Cognitive representations of candidate assessments. In K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid, & D. Nimmo (Eds.), Political communication yearbook - 1984 (pp. 183-210). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80, 521-540.

Miller, F. E. (1990). Exploring a relational perspective to political information processing. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 47-65), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Moon, D. (1990). What you use depends on what you have: Information effects on the determinants of electoral choice. American Politics Quarterly, 18, 3-24.

Mondak, J. J. (1994). Question wording and mass policy preferences: The comparative impact of substantive information and peripheral cure. Political Communication, 11, 165-183.

Mondak, J. J. (1994). Cognitive heuristics, heuristics processing, and efficiency in political decision making. In M. S. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Y. Shaprio (Eds). Research in micropoltics (Vol.4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Mondak, J. J. (1993). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior, 15, 167-192.

Mondak, J. J. (1993). Source cues and policy approval: The cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 186-212.

Mondak, J. J., & McCurley, C. (1994). Cognitive efficiency and the congressional vote: The psychology of coattail voting. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 151-175.

Merolla, J. L., Ramos, J. M., & Zechmeister E. J. (2007), Crisis, charisma, and consequences: Evidence from the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Politics, 69, 30–42.

Mullen, B., Futrell, D, Stairs, D., Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., Dawson, K. E., Riordan, C. A., Radloff, C. E., Goethals, G. R., Kennedy, J. G., and Rosenfeld, P. (1986). Newscasters' facial expressions and voting behavior of viewers: Can a smile elect a president. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 291-295.

Mutz, D. C. (1993). Direct and indirect routes to politicizing personal experience. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 483-502.

Mutz, D. C. (1992). Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 483-508.

Mutz, D. C., Sniderman, P. M., & Brody, R. A. (Eds.). (1996). Political persuasion and attitude change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., & Amato, T. (1995). Emotions, issue importance, and political learning. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 558-574.

Nelson, T. E. , Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue framing and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055-1078.

Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., Crigler, A. N., & Mackuen, M. (2007). The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Nimmo, D. (1995). The Formations of candidate images during presidential campaigns. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 51-64), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Nimmo, D. (1995). Intensive analysis and candidate image. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 135-144), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Nimmo, D. (1990). Principles of information selection in information processing: A preliminary political analysis. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 3-17), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Norrander, B. (1986). Correlates of vote choice in the 1980 presidential primaries. Journal of Politics, 48, 156-166.

Ottati, V. C. (1990). Determinants of political judgments: The joint influence of normative and heuristic rules of inference. Political Behavior, 12, 159-179.

Ottati, V. C., Fishbein, M, & Middlestadt, S.E. (1988). Determinants of voters’ beliefs about the candidates stands on the issues: The role of evaluative bias heuristics and the candidates’ expressed message. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 517-529.

Ottati, V. C., Steenberger, M. R., & Riggle, E. (1992). The cognitive and affective components of political attitude: Measuring the determinants of candidate evaluation. Political Behavior, 4, 423-442.

Ottati, V. C., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Affect and political judgments. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 296-315). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Owen, D. (1991). Media Messages in American presidential elections. Greenwood Press. (see chap 6, pp. 142-170, The uses and gratification of presidential campaign messages.)

Owens, J. (1998). The importance of candidate characteristics and local political conditions in the 1994 US mid-term elections. Political Studies, 46, 766-776.

Pan, Y., O'Curry, S., & Pitts, R. (1995). The attraction effect and political choice in two elections. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 85-101.

Patterson, T., & McClure, R. (1976). Television and the less-interested voter. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 425, 88-97.

Patton, G. W. R. (1978). Effect of party affiliation of student voters on the image of presidential candidates. Psychological Reports, 43, 243-246.

Patton, G. W. R., & Kaericher, C. E. (1980). Effect of characteristics of the candidate on voter’s preference. Psychological Reports, 47, 171-180.

Perloff, R. M. (1996). Perceptions and conceptions of political media impact: The third-person effect and beyond. In A. N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication (pp. 177-197). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Perloff, R. M. (1984). Political involvement: A critique and a process-oriented reformulation. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 146-160.

Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.

Pettey, G. R., & Brigliadoro, D. (1990). Sex differences in political information processing: An MDS approach to lateralization predictors. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 131-146), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pfau, M., Diedrich, T., Larson, K. M., Van Winkle, K. M. (1993). Relational and competence perceptions of presidential candidates during primary election campaigns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 275-292.

Pike, G. R. (1985, May). Toward a transactional model of political images: Collective images of the candidates in the 1984 elections. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association. Honolulu, Hawaii.

Pillai, R., Stites-Doe, S, Grewal, D., & Meindl, J. R. (1997). Winning charisma and losing the presidential election. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 1716-1726.

Pinkleton, B. E. (1999). Individual motivations and information source relevance in political decision making. Mass Communication and Society, 2, 65-80.

Pinkleton, B. E., & Austin, E. W. (2001). Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection. Political Communication, 18, 321-334.

Pinkleton, E. E., Reagan, J., Aaronson, D., & Chen, C. (1997). The role of individual motivation in information source use and knowledge concerning divergent topics. Communication Research Reports, 14, 291-301.

Popkin, S. L. (1997). Voter learning in the 1992 presidential campaign. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.) Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America (pp. 171-180). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

Popkin, S. L. (1991), The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Powell, L. (1977). Voting intention and the complexity of political images: A pilot study. Psychological Reports, 40, 243-246.

Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1987). Is the "presidential image" reserved for males? Sex-role stereotypes and the 1984 presidential election. Psychological Reports, 61, 491-495.

Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008). Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 169-183.

Quarles, R. C. (1979). Mass media use and voting behavior: The accuracy of political perceptions among first-time and experienced voters. Communication Research, 6, 407-436.

Rabinowitz, G, Prothro, J. W., & Jacoby, W. (1982). Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 44, 41-63.

Rahn, W. M. (1995). Candidate evaluation in complex information environments: Cognitive organization and comparison processes. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 43-64). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Rahn, W. M, Aldrich, J, Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J. (1990). A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In J. Ferejohn, J. and J. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic process (p. ). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Rapoport, R. B., Metcalf, K. L., & Hartman, J. A. (1989). Candidate traits and voter inferences: An experimental study. Journal of Politics, 51, 917-932.

Reeves, B., Chaffee, S. H., & Tims, A. (1982). Social cognition and mass communication research. In M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Rhee, J. W. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing. Journal of Communication, 47, 26-49.

Rhee, J. W. and Cappella, I. N. (1997). The role of political sophistication in learning from news: measuring schema development. Communication Research 24, 197-233.

Richey, S. (2012). Campaign advertising and the stimulation and activation of the authoritarian Personality. Political Communication, 29, 24-43.

Richey, S. (2008). Social basis of voting correctly. Political Communication, 25, 366-376.

Riggle. E. D. (1992). Cognitive strategies and candidate evaluations. American Politics Quarterly, 20, 227-246.

Roberts, C. L. (1981). From primary to the presidency: A panel study of images and issues in the 1976 election. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 60-70.

Roseman, I, Abelson, R., & Ewing, M. F. (1986). Emotion and political cognition: Emotional appeals in political communication. In R.R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rosenberg, S. W., & McCafferty, P. (1987). The image and the vote: Manipulating voters' preferences. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 31-47.

Rosenberg, S. W., Bohan, L., McCafferty, P., & Harris, K. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 108-127.

Rosenberg, S. W., Kahn, S., & Tran, T. (1991). Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Political Behavior, 13, 345-367.

Ryan, J. B. (2013). An experimental study of persuasive social communication. Political Communication, 30, 100-116.

Sanders, K. R., & Pace, T. J. (1977). the influence of speech communication on the image of a political candidate: "Limited effects" revisited. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook I (pp. 405-421). New Brusnwick, NJ: Transaction Press.

Savage, R. L. (1995). Creating the eye of the beholder: Candidate images and political socialization. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.) Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 37-50), Westport, CT: Praeger.

Schoenbach, K., & Baran, S. . (1990). Mass media effects on political cognition: How readers' images of journalists shape newspaper impact. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass Communication and political information processing, (pp. 85-97), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schram, S. C. (1991). The post-modern presidency and the grammar of electronic electioneering. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 210-216.

Schulz, A. (1998). Audience perceptions of politicians' self-presentation behaviors concerning their own abilities. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 173-188.

Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Evidence of long-term persistence of adults' political predispositions. Journal of Politics, 61, 1-28.

Sears, D. O., & Valentino, N. (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization. American Political Science Review, 91, 45-65.

Shah, D. V. (2001). The collision of convictions: Value framing and value judgments. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Eds.), Communication in U.S. Elections: New Agendas (pp. 55-74). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.

Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. (1996). "To thine own self be true": Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.

Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. (1997). Values and the vote: Linking issue interpretations to the process of candidate choice. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 357-387.

Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Fibison, M., & Fan, D. P. (2000). News coverage, economic cues, and the public's presidential preferences: 1984-1996. Journal of Politics, 61, 914-943.

Shamir, B. (1994). Ideological position, leaders' charisma, and voting preferences: Personal vs. partisan elections. Political Behavior, 16, 265-287.

Shapsie, K. A., & Bonchek, M. S. (1997). Analyzing politics: Rationality, behavior, and institutions.New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

Sheckels, T. F., & Bell, L. C. (2003). Character versus competence: Evidence from the 2000 presidential debates and elections. In L. L Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.) The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 59-71) . New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Shepherd, G. J. (1987). Individual differences in the relationship between attitudinal and normative determinants of behavioral intent. Communication Monographs, 54, 221-231.

Shields, S. A., & MacDowell, K. A. (1987). "Appropriate" emotion in politics: Judgments of a televised debate. Journal of Communication, 37, 78-89.

Shoemaker, P. J., Schooler, C., & Danielson, W. A. (1989). Involvement with the media: Recall versus recognition of election information. Communication Research, 16, 78-101.

Sidanius, J. (1988). Political sophistication and political deviance: A structural equation of context theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, , 37-51.

Siegel, R. S. (1966). Image of the American presidency: Part II of an exploration into popular views of presidential power. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 123-137.

Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. The American Political Science Review, 79, 293-304.

Sniderman, P. ., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Stamm, K. R. (1987). Cognitive strategies and communication during a presidential campaign. Communication Research, 14, 35-57.

Stephen, T., Harrison, T. M., Husson, W., & Albert, D. (2004). Interpersonal communication styles of political candidates: Predicting winning and losing candidates in three U.S. presidential elections (pp. 177-196). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Straits, B. C. (1991). Bring strong ties back in: Interpersonal gateways to political information and influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 432-58.

Striker, G. (1963). The use of the semantic differential to predict voting behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 159-167.

Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29, 29–54.

Stroh, P. K. (1995). Voters as pragmatic cognitive misers: The accuracy-effort trade-off in the candidate evaluation process. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 207-228). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Sullivan D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1994). Nonverbal cues, emotions, and trait attributions in the evaluation of political leaders: The contribution of biopolitics to the study of media and politics. In A. O. Somit, & S. Peterson (Eds.), Research in biopolitics (pp. 239-275). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1988). "Happy warriors": Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 345-368.

Taber, C. S., & Steenbergen, M. R. (1995). Computational experiments in electoral behavior. In M. Lodge and K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political Judgment: Structure and Processes (pp. 141-178). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 129-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Toward an intuitive politician model of attribution processes. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Trent, J. S., Short-Thompson, C., Mongeau, P. A., Nusz, A. K., & Trent, J. D. (2001). Image, media bias, and voter characteristics: The ideal candidate from 1988-2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2101-2124.

Trent, J. S., Mongeau, P. A., Trent, J. D., Kendall, K., & Cushing, R. B. (1993). The ideal candidate: A study of the desired attributes of the public and the media across two presidential campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 225-239.

Trent, J. S., Short-Thompson, C., Mongeau, P. A., Metzler, M. S., & Trent, J. D. (2005). The idealized presidential candidate: A vision over time. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 130-156.

Trent, J. S., Trent, J. D., Mongeau, P. A., Short-Thompson, C. (1997). The ideal candidate revisited: As study of the desired attributes of the public and the media across three Presidential campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1001-1019.

Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.

van Zoonen, L., Muller, F., Alinejad, D., Dekker, M., Duits, L., van Romondt Vis, P. & Wittenberg, W. (2007). Dr. Phil meets the candidates: How family life and personal experience produce political discussions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24, 322-338..

Vavreck, L. (2001). The Reasoning Voter Meets the Strategic Candidate: Signals and Specificity in Campaign Advertising, 1998. American Politics Research, 29, 507-529.

Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., Yang, J., Edgerly, S., Thorson, K., Wells, C., & Shah, D. V. (2014). Political influence across generations: partisanship and candidate evaluations in the 2008 election. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 184-202.

Way, B. M., & Masters, R. D. (1996). Emotion and cognition in political information-processing. Journal of Communication, 46, 48-65.

Weisberg, H. F., & Rusk, J. G. (1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 64, 1167-1185.

West, D. (1980). Cheers and jeers: Candidate presentations and audience reactions in the 1980 presidential campaign. American Politics Quarterly, 12, 23-50.

Wyer, R. S, Budesheim, T. L., Shavitt, S., Riggle, E. D., Melton, R. J., & Kuklinski, J. H., (1991). Image, issues, and ideology: The processing of information about political candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 533-545.

Zukin, C., & Snyder, R. (1984). Passive learning: When the media environment is the message. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 629-638.