Sunday, 25-Nov-2012 13:20:26 EST
Allen, C. (1992). Eisenhower's congressional defeat of 1956: Limitations of television and the GOP. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 22, 57-72.
Andrew, B. C. (2007). Media-generated shortcuts: Do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 24-43
Althaus, S. L. (2001). Who's voted in when the people turn out? Information effects in congressional elections. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Eds.), Communication in U.S. Elections: New Agendas (pp. 33-53). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
Atkeson, L. R., & Partin, R. W. (2001). Candidate advertisements, media coverage, and citizen attitudes: The agendas and roles of senators and governors in a federal system. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 795-813.
Atwood, L. E. (1980). From press release to voting reason: Tracing the agenda in a congressional campaign. In D. D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 467-482). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Barrett, A. W. (2001). Gone Public: The impact of presidential rhetoric in Congress. Dissertation Abstracts International
Bates, B. R. (2003). Ashcroft among the Senators: Justification, strategy, and tactics in the 2001 Attorney General confirmation hearing. Argumentation & Advocacy, 39, 231-253.
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Leech, B. L. (1997). Media attention and congressional agendas. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.) Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America (pp. 349-363). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Brazeal, L. M., & Benoit, W. L. On the spot: A functional analysis of congressional television spots, 1980-2004. Communication Studies , 57, 401-420.
Benoit, W. L., & Nill, D. M. (1998). A critical analysis of judge Clarence Thomas's statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Communication Studies, 49, 179-195.
Borquez, J., & Wasserman, D. (2004). Press coverage of the Lynn Rivers-John Dingell congressional primary campaign: Patterns of incumbent advantage in incumbent-versus-incumbent contest. Harvard International Journals of Press/Politics, 9, 60-74.
Boxer, B. (1994). Stranger in the senate: Politics an the new revolution of women in America. National Press Books.
Brasher, H. (2003). Capitalizing on contention: Issue agendas in U.S. Senate campaigns. Political Communication, 20, 453-471.
Brouwer, D. C. (2004). Privacy, publicity, and propriety in congressional eulogies for Representative Stewart B. McKinney (R-Conn.). Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 7, 191-214,
Burden, B. C. (2002). United States senators as presidential candidates, Political Science Quarterly, 117, 81-102.
Burden, B. C. (2002). When bad press is good news: The surprising benefits of negative campaign coverage. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 76-89.
Burrell, B. C. (1994). A Woman’s place is in the House: Campaigning for congress in a feminist era. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.
Butler, J. (1995). Carol Moseley-Braun’s day to talk about race: A study of forum in the United State Senate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32, 62-74.
Cameron, C., Lapinski, J. S., & Riemann, C. R. (2000). Testing formal theories of political rhetoric. Journal of Politics, 62, 187-205. [Looks at president to congress messages]
Canon, D., US Congress Bibliography, http://www.polisci.wisc.edu/~dcanon/syllabi/826bib.htm
Carroll, S. J., & Schreiber, R. (1997). Media coverage of women in the 103rd Congress. In P. Norris (Ed). Women, media, and politics (pp. 131-148). New York, Oxford University Press.
Clark, P., & Evans, S. H. (1983). Covering campaigns: Journalism in congressional elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Clayton, D. M. (2000). African Americans and the politics of congressional redistricting. Garland Publishing.
Coleman, J. J., & Manna, P. F. (2000). congressional campaign spending and the quality of democracy. Journal of Politics, 62, 757-789.
Communicating With Congress: How Capitol Hill Is Coping With The Surge In Citizen Advocacy (July 2005), Congressional Management Foundation. http://www.cmfweb.org/SupportingFiles/documents/Communicating_with_Congress_-_Report_1.pdf
Conway, M. (1984). The use of polls in congressional state, and local elections. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 472, 97-105.
Cook, R. (1999), How congress gets elected. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Cos, G. C. , & Snee, B. J. (2001). "New York, New York": Being and creating identity in the 2000 New York senate race. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2014-2029.
DeClercq, E. (1978). The use of polling in congressional campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 427-258.
Djupe, P. A., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2002). The impact of negative campaigning: Evidence from the 1988 senatorial primaries. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 845-860.
Dolon, J. & Kropf, J. S. (2004). Credit claiming from the U.S. House: Gendered communication styles?. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 41-59.
Donnelley, S. M. (2001). The candidates' of the incumbency in campaign 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2435-2439.
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2009). The Campaign communications in U.S. Congressional elections, American Political Science Review. 103, 343-366.
Eliving, R. D. (1996). Accentuate the negative: Contemporary congressional campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 29, 440-446.
Erickson, R. S., & Sigelman, L. (1995). Poll-based forecasts of midterm congressional election outcomes: Do the pollsters get it right? Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 589-605.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (2007). Congressional travels: Places, connections, and authenticity. New York: Pearson/Longman.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1996). Senators on the campaign trial: The politics of representation. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Fox, R. L. (2006). Congressional elections: Where are we on the road to gender parity? In S. J. Carroll & R. L. Fox. Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics (pp. 97-116). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, R. L. (1999). Gender dynamics in congressional elections. Sage Public Administration Abstracts 26, no. 2
Fox, R. L. (1999) Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Women & politics. 20, 109-
Fox, R. L. (1996). Gender dynamics in congressional elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Franklin, C. H. (1991). Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of U.S. Senate incumbents. American political Science Review, 85, 1193-1214.
Gaddie, R. K., Hoffman, K. U., & Palmer, C. (2000). Congressional elections beyond the year of the woman: A research update. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 879-884.
Gershon, S. A. (2008). Communicating female and minority interests online: A study of web site issue discussion among female, Latino, and African American Members of Congress. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 120-140.
Gertzog, I. (1995). Congressional women: Their recruitment, integration, and behavior, 2nd Edition. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Goldenberg, E., & Traugott, M. W. (1987). Mass media effects on recognizing and rating candidates in U.S. Senate elections. In J. P. Vermeer (Ed.), Campaigns in the news. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Goldenberg, E., & Traugott, M. W. (1987). Mass media in U. S. congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 317-337.
Granstaff, B. (1999). Losing our democratic spirit: Congressional deliberation and the dictatorship of propaganda. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Gray, R. (1984). Congressional television. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Gershon, S. A. (2012). Press secretaries, journalists, and editors: Shaping local Congressional news coverage. Political Communication, 29, 60–183.
Gring-Pemble, L. M. (2001). "'Are we going to now govern by anecdote?': Rhetorical construction of welfare recipient's in congressional hearings, debates, and legislation, 1992-1996. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87, 341-365.
Gulati, G. J. (2004). Members of congress and the presentation of self on the World Wide Web. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 22-40.
Hale, J. F., Fox, J. C., & Farmer, R. (1996). Negative advertisements in U.S. Senate campaigns: The influence of campaign context. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 329-343.
Herrnson, P. S., (2001). Playing hardball: Campaigning for the U.S. Congress. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Herrnson, P. S. (2000). Hired guns and house races: Campaign professional in house elections. In J. A. Thurber and C. J. Nelson (Eds.), Campaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections, (pp. 65-90). Brookings Institute.
Herrnson, P. S. (2000). Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington, 3rd Ed., Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Hess, S. (1991). Live from capitol Hill: Studies in Congress and the media. Washington, DC, Brookings Institute.
Hess, S. (1986). The ultimate insiders: U. S. senators in the national media. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Hill, K. Q., & Hurley, P A. (2002). Symbolic speeches in the U.S. Senate and their representational implications. Journal of Politics, 64, 219–231.
Hoff, P. S., & Bernstein, K (1988). Congress and the media: Beyond the 30-second spot: Enhancing the media' role in congressional campaign. Washington, D. C.: Center for Responsive Politics.
Hullett, C. R., & Louden, A. D. (1998, November). Influencing audience attributions at a congressional debate. National Communication Association. Chicago, IL
Hullett, C. R., & Louden, A. D. (1998). Audience Recall of Issues and Image in Congressional Debates (1998). Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 189-202.
Jacobson, G. C. (1997). The politics of congressional elections (4th Ed.). New York: Longman.
Jamieson, K. H. (2000). Incivility and its discontents: Lessons learned from studying civility in the U. S. House of Representatives. Carroll C. Arnold Distinguish Lecture, 1999. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Jarvis, S., and Wilkerson, K. (2005). Congress on the Internet: Messages on the homepages of the U.S. House of Representatives, 1996 and 2001. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/jarvis.htm
Johnson, D. W. (2004). Congress online: Bridging the gap between citizens and their representatives. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Jones, A. (2004). The Internet and the evolving nature of congressional communication: An interview with Girish J. Gulanti. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 3-6.
Kahn, K. F. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of US senate candidates. Journal of politics, 54, 497-517.
Kahn, K. F. (1991). Senate elections in the news: Examining campaign coverage. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16, 394-374.
Kahn, K. F., & Goldenberg, E. N (1991). Women candidates in the news: An examination of gender differences in US senate campaign coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 180-199.
Kahn, K. F., & Gordon, A. (1997). How women campaign for the U. S. senate: Substance and strategy. In P. Norris (Ed). Women, media, and politics (pp. 59-76). New York, Oxford University Press.
Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of US Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kaid, L. L., & Foote, J. (1985). How network television coverage of the president and congress compare, Journalism Quarterly, 62, 59-65.
Kaptur, M. (1996). Women of Congress: A twentieth-century odyssey. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Karp, W. (1989, July). All the congressmen's men. Harper's, 279, 55-63.
Kedrewski, K. M. (1996). Media entrepreneurs and the media enterprise in the U.S. Congress. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Kernell, S. & Jacobson, G. C. (1987). Congress and the presidency as news in the nineteenth century. Journal of Politics, 49, 1016-1035.
Kimsey, W. D., & Atwood, L. E. (1979). A path analysis of political cognitions and attitudes, communication and voting in a congressional campaign. Communication Monographs, 46, 219-230.
Koch, J. W. (2008). Campaign advertisements' impact on voter certainty and knowledge of House candidates' ideological positions. Political Research Quarterly. 61, 609-621.
Kuklinski, J. H., & Sigelman, L. (1992). When objectivity is not objective: Network television news coverage of U. S. senators and the "paradox of objectivity", Journal of Politics, 54, 810-833.
la Cour Dabelko, K. & Herrnson, P. S. (1997). Women's and men's campaigns for the U. S. House of Representatives, Political Research Quarterly, 50, 121-135.
Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lau, R R., & Pomper, G. M. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. Senate elections. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Len-Rios, M. E., & Benoit, W. L. (2004). Gary Condit's image repair strategies: Determined denial and differentiation. Public Relations Review, 30, 95-.
Lipinski, D. (2004). Congressional communication: Content & consequences , Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.
Lipinski, D. (2001). The outside game: Congressional communication and party structure. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Eds.), Communication in U.S. Elections: New Agendas (pp. 167-184). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.
Lipinski, D., & Neddernriep, G. (2004). Using "new" media to get "old" media coverage: How members of congress utilize their web sites to court journalists. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 7-21.
Maisel, L. S., & West, D. M. (Eds.) (2004). Running on empty? Political discourse in congressional elections. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
McNitt, A. D. (1985). Congressional campaign style in Illinois and Michigan, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10, 267-276.
Medvic, S. K. (2000). Professionalization in congressional campaigns. In J. A. Thurber and C. J. Nelson (Eds.), Campaign Warriors: Political Consultants in Elections, (pp. 91-109). Brookings Institute.
Medvic, S. K. (1997). Is there a spin doctor in the house: The impact of political consultants in congressional campaigns. Dissertation completed at Purdue University.
Miller, A. H. (1990). Public judgments of senate and house candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15, 525-542.
Miller, R. E., & Robyn, K. L. (1975). A field experimental study of direct mail in a congressional primary campaign: What effects last until election day. Experimental Study of Politics, 4, 1-37.
Mixon, F. G. Jr., (2002). Does legislative television alter the relationship between voters and politicians? Rationality and Society, 14, 109-128.
Mixon, F. G., Jr., & Upadhyaya, K. P. (2003). Legislative television as political advertising. iUniverse.
Mixon, F. G., Jr; Hobson, D. L., & Upadhyaya, K. P. (2001) .Gavel-to-gavel Congressional television coverage as political advertising: The impact of C-Span on legislative sessions, Economic Inquiry, 39, 351-364.
Mondak, J. J., Carmines, E. G., Huckfeldt, R., Dona-Gene Mitchell, D-G., & Schraufnagel , S. (2007). Does familiarity breed contempt? The impact of information on mass attitudes toward congress. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 34-48.
Mondak, J. J., & McCurley, C. (1994). Cognitive efficiency and the congressional vote: The psychology of coattail voting. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 151-175.
Moore, D. W., & Saad, L. (1997). Generic ballots in midterm congressional elections: Its accuracy and relationship to house seats. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 603-614.
Moore, M. P. (1997). Rhetorical subterfuge and "The Principle of Perfection," Part II: Bob Packwood’s senate resignation. Southern Communication Journal, 63, 37-55.
Morello, J. (1979). The public apology of a private matter: Representative Wayne Hays' address to Congress. Speaker and Gavel, 19-26.
Morris, J. S. (2001). Reexaming the politics of talk: Partisan rhetoric in the 104th House. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1, 101-121.
Morris, J. S., & Clawson, R. A. (2005). Media coverage of congress in the 1990s: Scandals, personalities, and the prevalence of policy and process. Political Communication, 22, 297-313.
Morris, J., & Witting, M. (2001). Congressional partisanship, bipartisanship and pubic opinion: An experimental analysis. Politics & Policy, 29, 47-67.
Mullen, J. J. (1963). How candidates for the Senate use newspaper advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 40, 532-538.
Murphy, T. A. (1995). American political mythology and the senate filibuster. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32, 90-107.
National Women's Political Caucus (1984). Women as candidates in the 1984 congressional elections: A post election survey of five congressional districts. Alexandria, VA: Cooper and Secrest Associates.
Niven, D., & Zilber, J. (2001). Do women and men in congress cultivate different images? Evidence from congressional web sites. Political Communication, 18, 395-405.
Owen, D., Davids, R., & Strickler, V. J. (1999). Congress and the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 10-29.
Palmer, B, & Simon, D. (2006). Breaking the political glass ceiling: Women and congressoinal elections. New York, NY: Routledge.
Palmer, B., & Simon, D. M. (2005). When women run against women: The hidden influence of female incumbents in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1956-2002. Politics & Gender, 1, 39-63.
Palmer, B., & Simon, D. (2001). The political glass ceiling: Gender, strategy, and incumbency in U.S. house elections, 1978-1998. Women & Politics, 23, 59-78.
Pfau, M. & Burgoon, M. (1989). The efficiency of issue and character attack message strategies in political campaign communication, Communication Reports, 2, 52-61.
Pitt, C. A. (1968). Speech training as preparation for the U.S. Senate, Speaker and Gavel, 91-93.
Price, D. E. (1992). The congressional experience: A view from the hill. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Raymond, P. B. (1987). Shaping the news: An analysis of House candidates' campaign communications. In J. P. Vermeer (Ed.), Campaigns in the news: Mass media and congressional elections (pp. 13-29). New York: Greenwood Press, 1987.
Reid, L., & Soley, L. (1982). Promotional expenditures in U. S. Congressional elections. Journal of Marketing and Public Policy, 1, 147-155.
Rosenthal, C. S. (Ed.), Women transforming Congress. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Rowland, R. C. (2006). Campign argument and the public sphere: A case study of the process of deve.oping messages in a congressional campaign. In P. Riley (Ed.) Engaging Argument (pp. 326-332) . Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Rozell, M. J. (1996). In contempt of Congress: Postwar press coverage on capitol hill. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Rozell, M. J., & Wilcox, C. (1998). Interest groups in American campaigns: The new face of electioneering. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Books.
Sabato, L. J. (Ed.), Midterm madness: The election of 2002. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. [Many articles of specific congressional races]
Sapiro, V., Walsh, K. C., Strach, P., & Hennings, V. (2011). Gender, context, and television advertising: A comprehensive analysis of 2000 and 2002 House races. Political Research Quarterly, 6, 107-120.
Schaffer, S. A., & Dantico, M. K. (1991). Negative advertising in the 1980 senate races: Does the truth ever catch the lie? Political Communication, 16, 1-14.
Schaffner, B. F., & Sellers, P. J. (2003). The structural determinants of local congressional news coverage. Political Communication, 20, 41-57.
Schiffer, A. (2006). Assessing partisan bias in political news: The case(s) of local Senate election coverage. Political Communication, 23, 23-39.
Schroedel, J. R., & Snyder, B. (1994). Patty Murray: The mom in tennis shoes goes to the senate. In E. A. Cook,, S. Thomas, & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The Year of the Woman: Myths and realities (pp. 49-70). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Sellers, R. J. (2000). Manipulating the message in the U.S. Congress. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 22-31.
Sellers, P. J. & Schaffner, B. F. (2007). Winning coverage in the U.S. Senate. Political Communication, 24, 377-391.
Shea, D. M. (1999). All scandal politics is local: Ethical lapses, the media, and congressional elections. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 45-62.
Sheckels, T. F. (2000). When congress debates: A Bakhtinian paradigm. Praeger.
Sheckels, T. F. (1997). The rhetorical use of double-voiced discourse and feminine style: The U. S. senate debate over the impact of Tailhook ’91 on Admiral Frank B. Kelso II’s retirement rank. Southern Communication Journal, 63, 56-68.
Short, B. (1987). Comic book apologia: The "paranoid" rhetoric of Congressman George Hansen. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 51, 189-203.
Sulkin, T., Moriarty, C. M., & Hefner, V. (2007). Congressional candidates' issue agendas on- and off-line. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 63-79.
Swer, M. L. (1998). Are congresswomen more likely to vote for women's issues bills than their male colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23, 435-448.
Tidmarch, C. M., Hyman, L. J., & Sorkin, J. E. (1984). Press issue agendas in the 1982 congressional and gubernatorial election campaigns. Journal of Politics, 46, 1226-1242.
Tinkham, S. F., & Weaver-Lariscy, R. A. (1995). Incumbency and its perceived advantage: A comparison of 1982 and 1990 congressional advertising strategies. Political Communication, 12, 291-304.
Tinkham, S. F., & Weaver-Lariscy, R. A. (1990). Advertising message strategy in U.S. Congressional campaigns: Its impact on election outcome. In J. H. Leigh & C. R. Martin, Jr. (Eds.), Current issues & research in advertising (Vol. 13, No. 1 & 2, pp. 1-21). Ann Arbor, MI: School of Business Administration.
Vavrus, M. (1998). Working the Senate from the outside in: The mediate construction of a feminist political campaign. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 15, 213-235.
Vermeer, J. (Ed.) (1987). Campaigns in the news: Mass media and congressional elections. New York: Greenwood.
Vigil, M. E. (1996). Hispanics in congress: A historical and political Survey. University Press of America.
Villalobos, J. D., Vaughn, J. S., & Azar, J. R. (2012). Politics or policy? How rhetoric matters to presidential leadership of Congress, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42, 549–576.
Wafai, M. (1989). Senators' television visibility and political legitimacy. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 323-390.
Watts, M. D. (1997). Framing Congress: Media coverage of the U.S. Congress and its impact on public opinion (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 1901.
Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., & Tinkham, S. F. (1996). Advertising message strategy in U S. Congressional campaigns, 1982, 1990. Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 18, 53-66.
Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., & Tinkham, S. F. (1996). Use of impact of direct mail in the context of integrated marketing communications: U.S. Congressional campaigns in 1982 and 1990. Journal of Business Research, 37, 233-244.
Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., & Tinkham, S. F. (1987). The influence of media expenditure and allocation strategies in congressional advertising campaigns. Journal of Advertising, 16, 13-21.
Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., Tinkham, S. F., & Nordstrom, K. E. (1987). The use and impact of polling as a strategic planning tool in congressional campaigns. Political Communication Review, 12, 1-24.
Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., & Tinkham, S. F. (1991). News coverage, endorsements and personal campaigning: The influence of non-paid activities in congressional elections. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 432-444.
West, D. M. (1994). Political advertising and news coverage in the 1992 California U. S. Senate campaigns. Journal of Politics, 56, 1053-1075.
Westlye, M. C. (1991). Senate elections and campaign intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Whitby, K. J. (1998). The color of representation: Congressional behavior and black interests. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.
Wicker, M. L., Jewell, M., & Duke, L. L. (1996). Women in congress. In L. Lovelace Duke (Ed.), Women in politics: outsiders or insiders? (pp. 35-46.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yarwood, D. L. (2004). When Congress makes a joke: Congressional humor then and now. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zibler, J., & Niven, D. (2000). Radicalized coverage of congress: The news in black and white. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Zilber, J., & Niven, D. (2000). Stereotypes in the news: Media coverage of African-Americans in congress. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 32-49.
Return to Political Communication HomePage