Financial statements are prepared
based on several common principles.
| Fixed in time |
Each statement deals with a particular
time period, such as a quarter or a year. |
| Going concern |
Businesses are regarded as going concerns. |
| Business entity |
Businesses are treated as entities separate and
distinct from their owners |
| Historical cost |
Financial statement values reflect historical
cost rather than current market value |
| One currency |
All transactions are recorded in the same currency,
in our case, the U.S. dollar. |
| Consistent |
Companies are expected to be consistent in the
way they record transactions from year to year. |
When are business transactions accounted for? Most
of us when we keep accounts (such as in a checkbook)
record transactions when we receive money or make payments
- so-called "cash-basis" accounting. But businesses
recognize transactions when they have their primary
economic impact, not when cash come in and goes out
- so-called "accrual-basis" accounting. In
fact, GAAP and the IRS require this method. By using
accrual accounting, businesses avoid a number of problems
and temptations to manipulate reporting of financial
results. For example, under accrual accounting the purchase
of inventory in one year, though used over many years,
is treated as a series of purchases that occur each
time a sale is made. And a sale is recorded when cash
is paid or there is a credit commitment. This means
revenues and expenses are often accrued even though
they have not been billed and no right to payment yet
exists!
One of the most surprising (and discomforting) aspects
about accounting is its focus on historical costs. Accountants
(as instructed by GAAP) look at the original purchase
price of assets when almost certainly they do not reflect
current value (or market price). If accounting is supposed
to give a current picture of a firm's finances, why
look at the original purchase price of its assets? There
are some practical answers:
- Historical costs reflect how items are initially
entered under double-entry bookkeeping
- Historical costs are objective and verifiable, making
manipulation tougher
- Historical costs avoid the constant task of re-valuing
assets as their market value falls and rises
And finally, using historical costs gives the accounting
profession gravitas - the appearance of being conservative
and trustworthy. |