[ show plain text ]
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Fred B. Moseley wrote:
> Allin, do you agree with this historically specific
> interpretation of Part 2, as you seem to suggest in (3168)
> and in (3208)?
Yes, that's my understanding. But Marx was not as clear as he
might have been, which creates the space for the sort of
objection that Gil raises.
Allin.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:10 EDT