From: dogangoecmen@aol.com
Date: Thu Apr 03 2008 - 13:19:11 EDT
Dear Dave, I recommend you reading the first chapter of the first volume of Capital very carefully. There Marx explains very well why the existence of money can be deduced dialectically from value form of commodity. Dogan -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Dave Zachariah <davez@kth.se> An: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu> Verschickt: Do., 3. Apr. 2008, 19:02 Thema: Re: [OPE] How to read Capital on 2008-04-03 14:13 dogangoecmen@aol.com wrote: > Because the state the embodiment of a general capitalist is. A state and a capitalist have in general only one thing in common: both are surplus appropriators. I think what Paul C is pointing out is that the existence of money -- such a central phenomena in capitalism -- cannot be deduced by some dialectical logic applied to specific features of capitalism. //Dave Z _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope ________________________________________________________________________ Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail für alle. Klicken Sie auf AOL.de um heraus zu finden, was es sonst noch kostenlos bei AOL gibt. _______________________________________________ ope mailing list ope@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT