Re: [OPE] No rise is s/v? Kliman's empirical work on the falling rate of profit

From: Paul Zarembka <zarembka@buffalo.edu>
Date: Sat Oct 17 2009 - 14:40:36 EDT

Easy way out, Phil, too easy. Paul

Philip Dunn wrote:
> Choosing 100%, just dropping the whole idea of unproductive
> labour, avoids issues that cannot be settled either theoretically or
> empirically.
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sat Oct 17 14:42:58 2009

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jurriaan Bendien: "[OPE] The profts in banking"
Previous message: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE] No rise is s/v? Kliman's empirical work on the falling rate of profit"
In reply to: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE] No rise is s/v? Kliman's empirical work on the falling rate of profit"
Next in thread: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE] No rise is s/v? Kliman's empirical work on the falling rate of profit"
Reply: Philip Dunn: "Re: [OPE] No rise is s/v? Kliman's empirical work on the falling rate of profit"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 31 2009 - 00:00:02 EDT