(OPE-L) Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 15:28:48 EST

Next message: Francisco Paulo Cipolla: "capitalists awareness of the origin of surplus value"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Rakesh wrote:

> linear production theory is the
> tool of the servants of a class in decline which would like to freeze
> reality as it is.

Huh?

Sraffa, Pasinetti, Steedman, Leontief, and von Neumann all wanted to
"freeze reality as it is" ??? !!!

I know Gary and Ajit wouldn't want to "freeze reality as it is." Does
that mean, according to your perspective, that they no longer
are advocates of linear production theory?  Or, are they unknowing
"tools" of the class in decline?

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Francisco Paulo Cipolla: "capitalists awareness of the origin of surplus value"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 03 2003 - 00:00:00 EST