[OPE-L:2927] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*

• Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:2928] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital"
• Previous message: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• In reply to: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Next in thread: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2946] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Reply: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2946] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ show plain text ]

On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, riccardo bellofiore wrote:

> ...though Luxemburg actually thought there WERE inconsistencies in Marx's
> thought!

and therefore the reason for Marxist economists not to read her carefully?

:)

Paul Z.

• Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:2928] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital"
• Previous message: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• In reply to: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Next in thread: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2946] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Reply: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2946] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:45 EDT