ope-l-0004
By Author

Starting: Sat Apr 01 2000 - 06:27:06 EST
Ending: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 17:38:48 EDT

• Alejandro Ramos
  • [OPE-L:2826] what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 13:09:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2750] "Austrians" reading Marx (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 16:13:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2747] Hegelian syllogism (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 11:58:59 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2732] Accumulation theory (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 17:34:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2731] Hegelian syllogism (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 17:34:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2730] Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 17:06:34 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2718] Accumulation theory (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 00:03:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2715] Hegelian syllogism (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 16:43:26 EDT)
• Allin Cottrell
  • [OPE-L:2853] Re: income distribution (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 19:26:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2850] Re: Re: Re: Market price of Capital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 14:37:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2849] Re: Market price of Capital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 14:33:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2829] Re: relabeling commodities, value, and socialism (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 19:15:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2828] Re: Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 19:01:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2796] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 19:36:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2786] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 15:55:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2758] Re: Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 23:39:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2755] Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 20:22:18 EDT)
• Andrew Brown
  • [OPE-L:2915] Re: re:starting points (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 07:28:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2900] Re: Re: Re: re:starting points (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 11:15:15 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2899] Re: Re: Re: re:starting points (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 10:42:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2870] Re: Re: re:starting points (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 10:48:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2868] Re: re:starting points (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 10:41:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2867] Re: re:starting points (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 08:57:46 EDT)
• Andrew_Kliman
  • [OPE-L:2958] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation ofCapital* (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 22:00:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2955] Re: Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 12:57:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2932] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 15:43:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2931] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 14:48:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2921] Need 3 (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 03:52:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2920] Need 2 (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 03:51:49 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2919] Need 1 (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 03:51:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2918] Determination of Value Transferred (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 03:51:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2866] Re: income distribution (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 01:44:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2838] Re: Re: positing of presuppositions, or the "scorecard" revisited (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 09:26:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2812] positing of presuppositions, or the "scorecard" revisited (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 11:23:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2733] Re: Re: Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 19:43:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2701] Re: Re: Critique (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 23:34:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2693] Marx's relationship to Hegel (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 12:23:12 EDT)
• Asfilho@aol.com
  • [OPE-L:2909] starting point and capital (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 13:47:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2908] starting point and capital (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 13:32:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2898] starting point and capital (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 06:10:34 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2891] starting point and capital (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 06:25:18 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2798] Marx's Method (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 05:07:24 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2722] Marx's method (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 10:36:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2674] slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 06:26:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2673] slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 04:02:15 EDT)
• C. J. Arthur
  • [OPE-L:2905] Re: starting point and capital (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 20:05:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2847] Re: Market price of Cpital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 10:08:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2729] Re: Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 17:39:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2724] Re: Hegelian syllogism (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 11:03:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2714] Re: Marx's *Capital*: Europe and Russia (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 14:47:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2713] Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 14:25:35 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2706] Marx's relationship to Hegel (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 12:47:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2698] Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 18:54:56 EDT)
• Catherine Samary
  • [OPE-L:2945] Re: OPE-L digest 86 (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:14:44 EDT)
• Chai-on Lee
  • [OPE-L:2736] RE: RE:Question for discussion (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 22:17:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2676] RE: slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 13:03:48 EDT)
• Claus Germer
  • [OPE-L:2893] Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply toFred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 16:47:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2841] Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply toFred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 18:05:03 EDT)
• clyder
  • [OPE-L:2914] Re: RE: Zimbabwe Petition (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 06:27:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2836] Re: Re: Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 06:54:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2834] Re: Re: relabeling commodities, value, and socialism (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 05:12:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2811] Re: relabeling comodities and money (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 10:57:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2808] Re: Re:Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 09:13:51 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2807] Re: RE: Slavery (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 07:47:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2799] Re: Re: Slavery (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 05:34:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2686] Re: Re: slaves and value (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 06:35:19 EDT)
• Duncan K. Foley
  • [OPE-L:2848] Re: Market price of Cpital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 11:47:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2774] Slavery (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 10:03:01 EDT)
• Francisco Paulo Cipolla
  • [OPE-L:2689] Re: Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understandhim? (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 09:55:46 EDT)
• Fred B. Moseley
  • [OPE-L:2907] Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 09:35:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2906] Re: starting point and capital (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 09:31:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2890] Re: re:starting points (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 09:42:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2883] Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 12:19:35 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2860] Re: distribution of income (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 00:21:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2840] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 16:37:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2818] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 15:21:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2784] Re: Hegel: particularity, universality, individuality (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 14:16:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2778] Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 11:21:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2777] Re: Marx's method (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 11:10:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2776] Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 11:02:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2775] Re: Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 10:54:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2760] Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 01:11:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2759] Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 01:02:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2743] Re: ONE reference to Hegel by Marx, C.W. Vol. 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 08:31:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2742] Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 08:23:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2720] Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 09:40:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2683] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 00:41:30 EDT)
• Gerald Levy
  • [OPE-L:2863] Re: income distribution (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 18:20:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2862] Re: starting points (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 17:59:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2861] Re: income distribution (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 10:32:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2858] the starting point in classical theory and Marx (Sun Apr 16 2000 - 09:32:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2856] on the money? (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 09:36:49 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2855] Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 07:59:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2852] income distribution (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 17:05:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2846] Re: Re: Market price of Capital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 10:13:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2844] Market price of Capital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 07:51:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2842] Re: relabeling commodities, value, and socialism (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 06:29:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2837] Rx Economics/Keynes (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 08:17:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2830] Re: relabeling commodities, value, and socialism (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 22:04:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2827] Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 15:30:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2823] Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 09:15:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2820] "What I learned at the World Economic Crisis" by Stiglitz (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 01:09:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2819] Re: relabeling comodities and money (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 16:25:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2813] relabeling commodities, value, and socialism (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 11:35:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2810] Re: slaves and value (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 10:09:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2809] Re: slaves and value (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 09:35:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2795] Marx and Hegel (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 19:31:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2789] consumption and accumulation (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 09:20:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2787] Re: Marx's method (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 16:03:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2779] Re: Marx's method (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 12:43:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2772] Elmar Wolfstetter (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 07:34:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2766] another close call (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 12:18:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2702] Re: slaves and value (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 07:18:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2697] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 18:47:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2696] Marx's *Capital*: Europe and Russia (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 18:45:15 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2687] Re: slaves and value (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 08:06:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2680] Re: slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 23:39:35 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2677] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 14:39:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2675] Re: slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 08:22:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2671] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 22:23:51 EST)
  • [OPE-L:2669] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 18:23:16 EST)
  • [OPE-L:2667] Re: slaves and value (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 15:44:59 EST)
  • [OPE-L:2665] Re: slaves and value (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 12:24:02 EST)
• Gil Skillman
  • [OPE-L:2904] Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 14:02:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2903] Re: starting point and capital (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 13:41:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2892] Re: starting point and capital (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 14:18:06 EDT)
• JERRY LEVY
  • [OPE-L:2950] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 07:46:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2944] Re: Re: working class (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 05:40:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2933] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 16:39:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2930] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 14:00:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2925] Re: Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 09:13:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2917] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 08:18:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2916] Re: Re: Marx and Hegel (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 07:40:03 EDT)
• John Ernst
  • [OPE-L:2797] Re: Accumulation and Consumption (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 03:37:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2788] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 03:13:50 EDT)
• makoto itoh
  • [OPE-L:2843] Market price of Cpital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 06:35:21 EDT)
• Martha Campbell
  • [OPE-L:2782] Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 14:14:49 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2768] Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 13:38:24 EDT)
• Michael Perelman
  • [OPE-L:2968] Re: Re: Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 11:39:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2954] Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 12:48:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2780] Re: Re: Wolfstetter and v. Weizsacker (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 13:08:49 EDT)
• Michael Williams
  • [OPE-L:2857] RE: Re: Partial Reply toFreds on Althusser (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 17:43:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2835] RE: 2829] Re: relabeling commodities, value, and socialism (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 05:42:53 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2794] RE: (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 16:41:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2793] RE: Re: Hegel & Formal Logic (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 16:29:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2740] Hegel: partcularity, universality and individuality (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 07:39:47 EDT)
• michael@ecst.csuchico.edu
  • [OPE-L:2694] Re: Accumulation theory (reply to Paolo) (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 09:29:55 EDT)
• nicola taylor
  • [OPE-L:2923] Re: Re: RE: Zimbabwe Petition (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 16:09:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2922] Re: RE: Zimbabwe Petition (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 15:40:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2912] Zimbabwe Petition (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 12:06:59 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2897] Re: Re: re:starting points (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 11:39:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2882] Re: Re: Marx and Hegel (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 12:27:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2881] Re: Re: re:starting points (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 12:30:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2879] Re: Re: Marx and Hegel (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 16:16:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2877] Re: Re: Re: re:starting points (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 13:50:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2865] Re: Re: income distribution (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 11:19:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2864] Re: Re: starting points (Mon Apr 17 2000 - 10:44:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2859] re:starting points (Sun Apr 16 2000 - 11:35:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2682] Re: Re: slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 11:57:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2681] Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 11:32:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2679] Re: slaves and value (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 10:09:04 EDT)
• P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk
  • [OPE-L:2913] RE: Zimbabwe Petition (Thu Apr 27 2000 - 03:35:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2806] RE: Re: RE: Slavery (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 04:02:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2804] RE: Slavery (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 16:17:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2803] RE: Re: Wolfstetter and v. Weizsacker (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 15:48:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2802] Vanishing centres of gravity (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 15:32:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2749] "Austrians" reading Marx (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 15:01:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2712] RE: Re: RE: slaves and value (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 13:38:51 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2707] RE: slaves and value (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 12:51:22 EDT)
• Patrick L. Mason
  • [OPE-L:2869] Re: Re: income distribution (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 10:48:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2851] distribution of income (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 15:19:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2845] Re: Market price of Capital (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 09:18:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2816] Re: Re: relabeling comodities and money (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:46:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2710] Re: RE: slaves and value (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 13:13:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2695] Re: slaves and value (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 16:38:00 EDT)
• Paul Cockshott
  • [OPE-L:2719] RE:Question for discussion (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 08:40:21 EDT)
• Paul Zarembka
  • [OPE-L:2969] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 16:28:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2960] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 08:32:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2959] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation ofCapital* (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 08:29:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2956] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 14:20:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2927] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 13:14:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2924] Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 09:43:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2885] Re: Re: Re: Marx and Hegel (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 23:55:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2880] Re: Marx and Hegel (Fri Apr 21 2000 - 10:16:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2878] Re: Marx and Hegel (Thu Apr 20 2000 - 13:53:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2785] Re: Marx's method (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 15:14:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2783] Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 14:13:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2773] Re: Wolfstetter and v. Weizsacker (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 08:47:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2770] Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 14:05:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2769] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 13:20:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2767] Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 12:33:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2764] Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 11:06:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2756] Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 21:03:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2753] (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 18:02:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2752] (4) Althusser on Alienation (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 17:25:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2751] (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 16:09:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2748] (2) Althusser on the Grundrisse and reading *Capital* (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 14:07:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2746] (1) Althusser on himself (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 12:01:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2744] Re: ONE reference to Hegel by Marx, C.W. Vol. 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 08:52:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2738] Re: Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 22:30:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2737] Lenin referencing Sieber (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 23:09:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2735] Re: Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 19:00:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2734] Re: Accumulation theory; also, Dunayevskaya (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 18:50:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2727] Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 14:46:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2726] ONE reference to Hegel by Marx, C.W. Vol. 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 14:04:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2723] Re: Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 10:57:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2721] Re: Accumulation theory (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 10:20:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2717] Re: Accumulation theory [Reply to Rakesh in 2711] (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 20:25:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2709] Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 13:10:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2708] Re: slaves and value (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 12:41:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2705] Re: Accumulation theory [Reply to Rakesh in 2685] (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 09:17:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2700] Re: Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 23:59:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2691] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required [Reply to Fred] (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 09:47:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2690] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required [Reply to Nicky] (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 09:32:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2688] Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 08:19:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2678] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sun Apr 02 2000 - 16:39:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2672] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 23:44:39 EST)
  • [OPE-L:2670] Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 20:55:41 EST)
  • [OPE-L:2668] Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 17:15:27 EST)
• Rakesh Bhandari
  • [OPE-L:2957] Re: Re: Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 15:43:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2952] Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 11:23:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2953] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 11:47:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2951] Re: Re: Re: working class (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 11:04:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2936] Re: Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 00:54:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2935] Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 21:22:59 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2934] Re: working class (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 19:36:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2929] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 14:25:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2928] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 14:14:59 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2911] Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 15:02:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2910] Re: Re: starting point and capital (Wed Apr 26 2000 - 14:02:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2902] Re: starting point and capital (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 13:40:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2901] Re: starting point and capital (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 13:35:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2896] Re: money fetishism (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 20:04:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2895] Re: Re: starting point and capital (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 19:04:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2894] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply toFreds on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Mon Apr 24 2000 - 18:31:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2889] Re: Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 03:45:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2888] globalization (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 03:28:35 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2887] Re: distribution of income (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 03:21:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2886] Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply toFreds on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Sun Apr 23 2000 - 03:17:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2884] Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 15:47:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2854] Re: Partial Reply toFreds on Althusser (Fri Apr 14 2000 - 20:37:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2817] Re: Re: Re: relabeling comodities and money (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 13:28:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2815] Re: positing of presuppositions, or the "scorecard" revisited (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:43:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2814] Re: RE: Re: RE: Slavery (Tue Apr 11 2000 - 11:36:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2805] Re: RE: Slavery (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 17:07:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2800] Re: Marx's Method (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 11:29:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2792] Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 15:15:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2791] Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 13:39:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2790] Re: Slavery (Sun Apr 09 2000 - 12:33:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2765] Re: Re: (3) "Epistemological Break" and Application to Political Economy (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 11:43:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2763] Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 09:14:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2757] Re: Re: Re: slaves and value (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 22:10:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2754] Re: Re: Re: slaves and value (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 18:02:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2745] Re: Re: Re: Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 11:32:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2728] Re: Summary of Sieber by Andrzej Walicki (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 15:13:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2725] Re: Re: Accumulation theory (Wed Apr 05 2000 - 12:39:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2716] Re: Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 18:27:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2711] Re: Re: Accumulation theory [Reply to Rakesh in 2685] (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 13:33:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2704] Re: Re: Re: Critique (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 10:27:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2703] Re: Re: slaves and value (Tue Apr 04 2000 - 09:40:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2699] Re: Re: slaves and value (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 21:19:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2692] Accumulation theory (reply to Paolo) (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 11:47:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2685] Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required to understand him? (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 03:10:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2684] Re: Re: slaves and value (Mon Apr 03 2000 - 00:47:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2666] Re: Re: slaves and value (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 12:56:47 EST)
  • [OPE-L:2664] Re: Re: slaves and value (Sat Apr 01 2000 - 09:27:00 EST)
• riccardo bellofiore
  • [OPE-L:2967] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:54:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2966] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation ofCapital* (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:41:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2965] Re: Re: Re: Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:30:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2964] Re: Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:19:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2963] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:16:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2961] Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:14:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2962] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sun Apr 30 2000 - 10:10:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2949] Re: Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 07:11:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2948] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:54:24 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2947] Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:46:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2946] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:33:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2943] Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:25:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2942] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply toFred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:18:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2941] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:04:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2940] Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 06:01:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2937] Re: Re: Re: Marx and Keynes and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 05:43:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2939] Re: Re: Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 05:04:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2938] Schumpeter and Riccardo on money (Sat Apr 29 2000 - 05:57:24 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* (Fri Apr 28 2000 - 13:28:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2876] Re: on the money? (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 15:15:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2875] Re: Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 15:07:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2874] Re: Re: Partial Reply toFreds on Althusser (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 14:44:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2873] Re: Re: Re: positing of presuppositions, or the "scorecard" revisited (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 13:53:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2872] Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply toFred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 14:38:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2871] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Tue Apr 18 2000 - 14:21:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2839] Re: Rx Economics/Keynes (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 10:51:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2833] Re: Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 05:59:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2832] Re: Re: Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 05:44:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2831] Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Thu Apr 13 2000 - 05:37:34 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2825] Re: Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 12:54:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2824] Re: Re: what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 12:52:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2822] what a Marxist may learn from Keynes? (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 07:17:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2821] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Wed Apr 12 2000 - 03:57:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2801] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Mon Apr 10 2000 - 14:33:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2781] Re: Re: Re: Re: (5 end) Partial Reply to Fred's on Althusser, concluding with CLASS STRUGGLE (Sat Apr 08 2000 - 13:36:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2771] Re: Re: Re: Reply to Rakesh on Fred on Althusser (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 15:37:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2762] Re: Re: Re: Re: Proof from Marx that Hegel is NOT required (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 04:57:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2761] Re: Hegelian syllogism (Fri Apr 07 2000 - 04:44:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2741] Re: Hegel: partcularity, universality and individuality (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 09:19:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:2739] Re: Hegelian syllogism (Thu Apr 06 2000 - 04:59:32 EDT)

Last message date: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 17:38:48 EDT
Archived on: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:46 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:46 EDT