[OPE-L:3319] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplusvalue be

• Next message: Andrew_Kliman: "[OPE-L:3320] Replies"
• Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:3318] Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value"
• In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "[OPE-L:3314] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be"
• Next in thread: Ajit Sinha: "[OPE-L:3339] Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ show plain text ]

It depends on the composition of the capital. If labor inputs predominate, it
will not affect it much.

Paul Cockshott wrote:

> At 07:58 24/05/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Paul. I don't understand. Does this refer to some typo in my original
> >message?
>
> no, what 0f error do the factors you mention cause to value measurement?
>
> > >
> > > At 07:06 24/05/00 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >I have long been convinced that value cannot be precisely measured.
> > >
> > >
> > > error bars?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Michael Perelman
> >Economics Department
> >California State University
> >Chico, CA 95929
> >
> >Tel. 530-898-5321
> >E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu

• Next message: Andrew_Kliman: "[OPE-L:3320] Replies"
• Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:3318] Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value"
• In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "[OPE-L:3314] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be"
• Next in thread: Ajit Sinha: "[OPE-L:3339] Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EDT