ope-l-0005
By Date

Starting: Mon May 01 2000 - 12:55:25 EDT
Ending: Tue May 30 2000 - 23:52:53 EDT

• [OPE-L:2970] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's*Accumulation ofCapital* Andrew_Kliman (Mon May 01 2000 - 12:54:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2971] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's*Accumulation ofCapital* ernst@pipeline.com (Mon May 01 2000 - 14:47:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2972] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* Andrew_Kliman (Mon May 01 2000 - 14:52:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2973] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* Paul Zarembka (Mon May 01 2000 - 15:59:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2974] clarifications JERRY LEVY (Mon May 01 2000 - 17:59:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2975] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* Andrew_Kliman (Tue May 02 2000 - 00:53:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2976] Re: Re: Re: Re: working class JERRY LEVY (Tue May 02 2000 - 07:28:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2977] Reply to Andrew on Definitions [was 2975] Paul Zarembka (Tue May 02 2000 - 08:54:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2978] Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical Contradictions, Positivism? Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 02 2000 - 11:10:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2979] Greenwich seminars in Critical Political Economy Alan Freeman (Tue May 02 2000 - 11:18:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2980] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's*Accumulation ofCapital* Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 02 2000 - 11:34:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2981] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: working class Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 02 2000 - 11:55:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2982] Defining accumulation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Tue May 02 2000 - 12:51:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2983] Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Tue May 02 2000 - 13:07:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2984] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: working class JERRY LEVY (Tue May 02 2000 - 15:48:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2985] Re: Need 3 C. J. Arthur (Tue May 02 2000 - 18:26:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2986] Query ·ùµ¿¹ (Tue May 02 2000 - 21:24:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2987] Re: Query Andrew_Kliman (Wed May 03 2000 - 02:12:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2988] Re: Re: Need 3 Ajit Sinha (Wed May 03 2000 - 03:25:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2989] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: working class nicola taylor (Tue May 02 2000 - 15:40:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2990] Re: Defining accumulation clyder (Wed May 03 2000 - 05:39:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2991] Re: Query clyder (Wed May 03 2000 - 05:54:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2992] RE: Re: Defining accumulation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed May 03 2000 - 06:48:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2993] RE: Re: Defining accumulation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed May 03 2000 - 06:52:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2994] Zimbabwe P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed May 03 2000 - 07:54:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2995] Re: Re: Need 3 corection to my last C. J. Arthur (Wed May 03 2000 - 08:22:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2996] Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation clyder (Wed May 03 2000 - 08:28:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2997] RE: Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed May 03 2000 - 08:52:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2998] Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation Allin Cottrell (Wed May 03 2000 - 09:43:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:2999] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation Allin Cottrell (Wed May 03 2000 - 09:50:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3000] Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Wed May 03 2000 - 10:25:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3001] query/cite Asfilho@aol.com (Wed May 03 2000 - 12:54:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3002] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed May 03 2000 - 13:44:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3003] Zimbabwe Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 03 2000 - 14:23:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3004] Re: Re : Query ·ùµ¿¹ (Wed May 03 2000 - 22:10:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3005] Re: Zimbabwe nicola taylor (Wed May 03 2000 - 15:56:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3006] Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation clyder (Thu May 04 2000 - 04:54:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3007] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation clyder (Thu May 04 2000 - 04:56:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3009] Re: Zimbabwe nicola taylor (Wed May 03 2000 - 17:11:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3008] Re: Re: Re : Query clyder (Thu May 04 2000 - 05:01:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3010] RE:Zimbabwe nicola taylor (Wed May 03 2000 - 17:49:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3011] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Defining accumulation JERRY LEVY (Thu May 04 2000 - 06:43:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3012] Re: Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Thu May 04 2000 - 08:43:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3013] Re: Defining accumulation clyder (Thu May 04 2000 - 11:34:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3014] Race and justification in Zimbabwe nicola taylor (Thu May 04 2000 - 12:07:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3015] Re: Need 3 corection to my last Andrew_Kliman (Fri May 05 2000 - 01:17:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3016] Fw: first round signatories of the appeal Andrew_Kliman (Fri May 05 2000 - 01:25:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3017] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Cockshott (Fri May 05 2000 - 07:30:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3018] Re: Re: Defining accumulation JERRY LEVY (Fri May 05 2000 - 07:30:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3019] empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? JERRY LEVY (Fri May 05 2000 - 07:46:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3020] Once again on Slave Labor Chai-on Lee (Fri May 05 2000 - 11:46:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3021] Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Patrick L. Mason (Fri May 05 2000 - 12:56:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3022] Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Steve Keen (Sat May 06 2000 - 06:06:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3023] Re: Re: RE: Zimbabwe Petition Paul Cockshott (Mon May 01 2000 - 15:25:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3024] Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? JERRY LEVY (Fri May 05 2000 - 18:18:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3025] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Sat May 06 2000 - 07:52:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3026] Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Steve Keen (Sat May 06 2000 - 23:22:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3027] Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Fred B. Moseley (Sat May 06 2000 - 13:12:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3028] Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? nicola taylor (Sat May 06 2000 - 16:24:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3029] Re: Re: Re: RE: Zimbabwe Petition nicola taylor (Sat May 06 2000 - 16:52:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3030] Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Sun May 07 2000 - 07:55:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3031] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Paul Zarembka (Sun May 07 2000 - 09:57:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3032] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Zimbabwe Petition Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 07 2000 - 11:47:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3033] slavery Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 07 2000 - 12:35:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3034] Simple Commodity Production David Laibman (Sun May 07 2000 - 14:48:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3035] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital Gil Skillman (Sun May 07 2000 - 17:48:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3036] Marx's starting point Fred B. Moseley (Sun May 07 2000 - 21:27:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3037] Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Fred B. Moseley (Sun May 07 2000 - 21:33:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3038] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Fred B. Moseley (Sun May 07 2000 - 22:04:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3039] Re: Simple Commodity Production Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 07 2000 - 22:15:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3040] Re: Simple Commodity Production Fred B. Moseley (Sun May 07 2000 - 22:33:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3041] Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Zarembka (Sun May 07 2000 - 22:36:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3042] Re: Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 07 2000 - 23:58:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3043] Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 08 2000 - 00:25:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3044] Re: Marx's starting point Steve Keen (Mon May 08 2000 - 20:51:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3045] Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Cockshott (Mon May 08 2000 - 07:30:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3046] Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Paul Cockshott (Mon May 08 2000 - 07:37:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3047] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Cockshott (Mon May 08 2000 - 07:49:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3048] Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Mon May 08 2000 - 08:19:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3049] Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Cockshott (Mon May 08 2000 - 08:58:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3050] Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Zarembka (Mon May 08 2000 - 09:29:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3051] Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Ajit Sinha (Mon May 08 2000 - 10:29:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3052] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital* JERRY LEVY (Sun May 07 2000 - 06:51:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3053] Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Jerry Levy (Mon May 08 2000 - 12:48:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3054] Brazilian Landless Movement Claus Germer (Mon May 08 2000 - 13:57:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3055] Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Mon May 08 2000 - 14:06:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3056] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Tue May 09 2000 - 05:05:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3057] Re: Re: Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Cockshott (Tue May 09 2000 - 05:15:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3058] Re: Re: Defining accumulation Paul Cockshott (Tue May 09 2000 - 05:18:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3059] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Cockshott (Tue May 09 2000 - 05:23:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3060] Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Ajit Sinha (Tue May 09 2000 - 05:53:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3061] Re: Simple Commodity Production Dr Michael J Williams (Tue May 09 2000 - 06:22:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3062] Re: Marx's starting point Ajit Sinha (Tue May 09 2000 - 07:54:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3063] Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Cockshott (Tue May 09 2000 - 09:07:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3064] Re: Defining accumulation Paul Zarembka (Tue May 09 2000 - 09:08:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3065] Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? JERRY LEVY (Tue May 09 2000 - 08:10:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3066] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 09 2000 - 10:58:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3067] Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 09 2000 - 11:04:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3068] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 09 2000 - 11:28:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3069] Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Patrick L. Mason (Tue May 09 2000 - 12:38:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3070] Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? JERRY LEVY (Tue May 09 2000 - 11:57:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3071] Re: Simple Commodity Production Allin Cottrell (Tue May 09 2000 - 15:20:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3072] Re: Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? (fwd) Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 09 2000 - 18:24:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3073] RE: Re: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Tue May 09 2000 - 18:36:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3074] Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! JERRY LEVY (Tue May 09 2000 - 15:49:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3075] Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Zarembka (Tue May 09 2000 - 20:01:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3076] Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! JERRY LEVY (Tue May 09 2000 - 16:54:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3077] Re: RE: Re: Simple Commodity Production (fwd) Allin Cottrell (Tue May 09 2000 - 20:25:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3078] Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Patrick L. Mason (Tue May 09 2000 - 20:40:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3079] Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Gil Skillman (Tue May 09 2000 - 22:56:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3080] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 10 2000 - 00:56:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3081] Re: Re: RE: Re: Simple Commodity Production (fwd) Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 10 2000 - 00:59:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3082] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? (fwd) Steve Keen (Wed May 10 2000 - 21:23:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3083] Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Steve Keen (Wed May 10 2000 - 21:43:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3085] RE: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Wed May 10 2000 - 06:53:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3084] RE: starting points Michael Williams (Wed May 10 2000 - 06:53:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3086] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Steve Keen (Wed May 10 2000 - 22:00:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3087] Re: RE: Simple Commodity Production Allin Cottrell (Wed May 10 2000 - 08:17:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3088] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? (fwd) JERRY LEVY (Wed May 10 2000 - 06:45:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3089] Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! JERRY LEVY (Wed May 10 2000 - 06:57:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3090] Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Andrew_Kliman (Wed May 10 2000 - 09:34:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3091] Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Andrew_Kliman (Wed May 10 2000 - 09:35:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3092] RE: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Wed May 10 2000 - 09:08:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3093] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 10 2000 - 10:12:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3094] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? (fwd) Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 10 2000 - 10:27:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3095] Re: RE: starting points Paul Cockshott (Wed May 10 2000 - 10:37:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3096] SIEBER is at British Library under Ziber, N. for those interested! Paul Zarembka (Wed May 10 2000 - 11:11:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3097] Re: RE: Simple Commodity Production Allin Cottrell (Wed May 10 2000 - 11:13:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3098] Re: Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 10 2000 - 11:06:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3099] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 10 2000 - 12:39:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3100] Value, Price and Profit as a summary Paul Zarembka (Wed May 10 2000 - 11:48:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3101] Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Steve Keen (Thu May 11 2000 - 05:31:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3102] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Steve Keen (Thu May 11 2000 - 05:34:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3103] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: empirical verification of interpretations of Marx? (fwd) Steve Keen (Thu May 11 2000 - 05:37:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3104] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Steve Keen (Thu May 11 2000 - 05:43:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3105] Re: Value, Price and Profit as a summary Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 10 2000 - 14:47:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3106] Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Gil Skillman (Wed May 10 2000 - 15:27:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3107] Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Andrew_Kliman (Wed May 10 2000 - 15:55:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3108] Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Steve Keen (Thu May 11 2000 - 07:16:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3109] Re: Value, Price and Profit as a summary Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 10 2000 - 16:17:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3110] RE: [OPE-L:3106E: starting points Michael Williams (Wed May 10 2000 - 16:47:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3111] Re: Re: Value, Price and Profit as a summary JERRY LEVY (Wed May 10 2000 - 16:59:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3112] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Gil Skillman (Wed May 10 2000 - 17:20:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3113] Postscripts Gil Skillman (Wed May 10 2000 - 18:00:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3114] Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Allin Cottrell (Wed May 10 2000 - 20:32:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3115] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 11 2000 - 03:00:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3116] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 11 2000 - 04:08:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3117] Re: SIEBER is at British Library under Ziber, N. for those interested! Paul Cockshott (Thu May 11 2000 - 06:12:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3118] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jerry, Don't be Aghast!!! Paul Cockshott (Thu May 11 2000 - 06:16:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3119] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Thu May 11 2000 - 08:30:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3120] starting points Asfilho@aol.com (Thu May 11 2000 - 09:02:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3121] Re: re:starting points Paul Cockshott (Thu May 11 2000 - 09:42:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3122] Re: starting points JERRY LEVY (Thu May 11 2000 - 09:30:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3123] Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Paul Zarembka (Thu May 11 2000 - 10:16:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3124] Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? JERRY LEVY (Thu May 11 2000 - 11:02:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3125] Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Paul Zarembka (Thu May 11 2000 - 12:13:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3126] Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? JERRY LEVY (Thu May 11 2000 - 12:49:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3132] RE: RE: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Thu May 11 2000 - 18:14:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3131] Bottom line: idealism v. materialism Paul Zarembka (Thu May 11 2000 - 16:35:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3130] Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Paul Zarembka (Thu May 11 2000 - 16:23:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3129] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Steve Keen (Fri May 12 2000 - 06:45:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3127] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Paul Zarembka (Thu May 11 2000 - 14:43:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3128] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Gerald Levy (Thu May 11 2000 - 15:14:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3133] Re: starting points Ajit Sinha (Fri May 12 2000 - 03:58:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3134] Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Fri May 12 2000 - 04:11:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3135] re:Zimbabwe petition nicola taylor (Thu May 11 2000 - 17:45:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3136] Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Paul Cockshott (Fri May 12 2000 - 06:06:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3137] Re: Bottom line: idealism v. materialism JERRY LEVY (Fri May 12 2000 - 06:21:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3138] Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Paul Cockshott (Fri May 12 2000 - 07:02:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3139] capitalist mode of production Fred B. Moseley (Fri May 12 2000 - 08:29:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3140] Re: RE:race and justification in Zimbabwe nicola taylor (Thu May 11 2000 - 20:16:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3141] Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? nicola taylor (Thu May 11 2000 - 20:30:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3142] Scholarship and 'dead dogs' Paul Zarembka (Fri May 12 2000 - 09:34:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3143] Re: capitalist mode of production Paul Zarembka (Fri May 12 2000 - 10:04:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3144] Two prefaces Asfilho@aol.com (Fri May 12 2000 - 10:29:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3145] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Fri May 12 2000 - 10:51:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3146] Re: Re: RE:race and justification in Zimbabwe Rakesh Bhandari (Fri May 12 2000 - 10:54:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3147] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Allin Cottrell (Fri May 12 2000 - 10:57:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3148] Re: [Re: capitalist mode of production] Jerry Levy (Fri May 12 2000 - 11:21:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3149] Re: Re: Marx's starting point Fred B. Moseley (Fri May 12 2000 - 12:30:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3150] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Fred B. Moseley (Fri May 12 2000 - 12:37:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3151] Re: Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Fred B. Moseley (Fri May 12 2000 - 12:39:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3152] Re: Re: RE: Re: Simple Commodity Production (fwd) Fred B. Moseley (Fri May 12 2000 - 12:50:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3153] Re: RE: RE: Simple Commodity Production Fred B. Moseley (Fri May 12 2000 - 12:59:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3154] Re: Re: [Re: capitalist mode of production] Paul Zarembka (Fri May 12 2000 - 12:37:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3155] Re: Re: Re: Marx's starting point Paul Zarembka (Fri May 12 2000 - 13:49:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3156] Re: Re: RE: RE: Simple Commodity Production Duncan K. Foley (Fri May 12 2000 - 14:33:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3157] Production for Production's Sake (was Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*) Andrew_Kliman (Fri May 12 2000 - 15:53:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3158] Marx's commodity Allin Cottrell (Fri May 12 2000 - 16:22:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3159] Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Gil Skillman (Fri May 12 2000 - 17:47:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3160] Re: Production for Production's Sake (was Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*) Duncan K. Foley (Fri May 12 2000 - 17:49:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3161] RE: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Fri May 12 2000 - 18:10:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3162] FW: RE: RE: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Fri May 12 2000 - 18:10:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3163] Re: Re: Production for Production's Sake (was Need 1 andLuxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*) Andrew_Kliman (Fri May 12 2000 - 19:00:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3164] Correction in my reply to Duncan Andrew_Kliman (Fri May 12 2000 - 19:05:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3165] Re: Production for Production's Sake (was Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*) Rakesh Bhandari (Fri May 12 2000 - 19:16:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3166] Race and Justification Rakesh Bhandari (Fri May 12 2000 - 19:37:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3167] Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Allin Cottrell (Fri May 12 2000 - 21:47:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3168] More in response to Gil Allin Cottrell (Fri May 12 2000 - 22:09:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3169] Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Ajit Sinha (Fri May 12 2000 - 06:51:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3170] Re: Production for Production's Sake Andrew_Kliman (Sat May 13 2000 - 01:29:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3171] Re: Race and Justification nicola taylor (Fri May 12 2000 - 16:10:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3172] Re: Re: Re: RE:race and justification in Zimbabwe nicola taylor (Fri May 12 2000 - 17:28:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3173] Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Ajit Sinha (Sat May 13 2000 - 05:50:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3174] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Sat May 13 2000 - 06:02:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3175] Re: Re: Re: Marx's starting point Ajit Sinha (Sat May 13 2000 - 08:30:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3176] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Sat May 13 2000 - 08:56:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3177] Re: [Correction] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Sat May 13 2000 - 09:12:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3178] the logic behind the sequence of topics to be presented JERRY LEVY (Sat May 13 2000 - 09:30:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3179] Accelerated ACcumulation ernst@pipeline.com (Sat May 13 2000 - 11:14:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3180] Re: the logic behind the sequence of topics to be presented nicola taylor (Sat May 13 2000 - 14:03:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3181] Re: Re: Re: Marx's starting point Ajit Sinha (Sun May 14 2000 - 05:40:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3182] Re: starting points Paul Zarembka (Sun May 14 2000 - 08:52:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3183] Re: Marx's starting point Paul Zarembka (Sun May 14 2000 - 09:14:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3184] Re: Re: Race and Justification Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 14 2000 - 11:24:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3185] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE:race and justification in Zimbabwe Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 14 2000 - 11:24:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3186] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 14 2000 - 11:24:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3187] Re: Accelerated ACcumulation Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 14 2000 - 11:24:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3188] Emendation in reply to Allin Gil Skillman (Sun May 14 2000 - 14:07:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3189] Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Zarembka (Sun May 14 2000 - 14:04:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3190] Re: capitalist mode of production Gil Skillman (Sun May 14 2000 - 15:57:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3191] Re: Re: capitalist mode of production Gil Skillman (Sun May 14 2000 - 16:03:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3192] Re: More in response to Gil Gil Skillman (Sun May 14 2000 - 16:50:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3193] Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Gil Skillman (Sun May 14 2000 - 18:00:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3195] Re: Re: Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Paul Cockshott (Sun May 14 2000 - 18:36:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3194] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx -> Hegel -> Spinoza -> Epicurus -> ? Paul Cockshott (Sun May 14 2000 - 18:35:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3196] Re: Re: RE: RE: Simple Commodity Production Paul Cockshott (Sun May 14 2000 - 18:36:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3197] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Gil Skillman (Sun May 14 2000 - 19:35:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3198] Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Ajit Sinha (Mon May 15 2000 - 01:01:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3199] Re: Re: Simple Commodity Production Ajit Sinha (Mon May 15 2000 - 05:00:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3200] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Mon May 15 2000 - 06:29:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3201] Reply to Gil and Ajit: Simple Commodity Production/ "Contemporary society" Paul Zarembka (Mon May 15 2000 - 10:16:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3202] Re: Re: Production for Production's Sake (was Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*) Paul Zarembka (Mon May 15 2000 - 10:48:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3203] RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk (Mon May 15 2000 - 11:34:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3204] process & subjects JERRY LEVY (Mon May 15 2000 - 07:19:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3205] Re: Re: capitalist mode of production Fred B. Moseley (Mon May 15 2000 - 12:51:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3206] Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation Andrew_Kliman (Mon May 15 2000 - 13:25:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3207] Re: Re: Re: capitalist mode of production Allin Cottrell (Mon May 15 2000 - 16:24:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3208] Re: Re: More in response to Gil Allin Cottrell (Mon May 15 2000 - 16:59:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3209] *reminder* JERRY LEVY (Mon May 15 2000 - 16:41:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3210] Re: Re: Re: Re: capitalist mode of production Fred B. Moseley (Mon May 15 2000 - 17:46:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3211] Spinoza John Holloway (Mon May 15 2000 - 18:15:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3212] Boole John Holloway (Mon May 15 2000 - 18:16:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3213] Re: Re: the logic behind the sequence of topics to be presented JERRY LEVY (Mon May 15 2000 - 18:36:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3214] Re: Boole Allin Cottrell (Mon May 15 2000 - 19:18:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3215] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: capitalist mode of production Allin Cottrell (Mon May 15 2000 - 19:54:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3216] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Allin Cottrell (Mon May 15 2000 - 20:56:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3217] Re: Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 15 2000 - 21:08:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3218] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 15 2000 - 21:08:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3219] Accelerated ACcumulation Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 15 2000 - 21:40:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3220] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 15 2000 - 21:55:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3221] *reminder* Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 15 2000 - 22:11:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3222] Re: Spinoza Paul Zarembka (Mon May 15 2000 - 23:10:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3223] Re: Re: Spinoza Andrew_Kliman (Tue May 16 2000 - 03:43:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3224] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: re:starting points Ajit Sinha (Tue May 16 2000 - 05:30:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3225] Re: Reply to Gil and Ajit: Simple Commodity Production/ "Contemporary society" Ajit Sinha (Tue May 16 2000 - 08:02:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3226] Re: Spinoza John Holloway (Tue May 16 2000 - 08:13:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3227] Re: process & subjects Paul Cockshott (Tue May 16 2000 - 08:23:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3228] Re: Boole Paul Cockshott (Tue May 16 2000 - 08:34:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3229] Re: Re: Spinoza JERRY LEVY (Tue May 16 2000 - 06:50:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3230] Re: Re: Spinoza Paul Zarembka (Tue May 16 2000 - 09:33:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3231] Re: Re: Re: Spinoza Paul Zarembka (Tue May 16 2000 - 09:57:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3232] Re: Re: Reply to Gil and Ajit: Simple Commodity Production/ "Contemporary society" Paul Zarembka (Tue May 16 2000 - 10:07:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3233] Re: Re: Re: Re: Spinoza JERRY LEVY (Tue May 16 2000 - 10:59:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3234] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Gil Skillman (Tue May 16 2000 - 11:58:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3235] Re: Re: Re: Spinoza Andrew_Kliman (Tue May 16 2000 - 16:45:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3236] Re: Re: Re: Re: Spinoza JERRY LEVY (Tue May 16 2000 - 17:58:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3237] Two visions of Marx's "starting point" Gil Skillman (Tue May 16 2000 - 18:45:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3238] Re: *reminder* nicola taylor (Tue May 16 2000 - 13:33:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3239] Re: Re: Re: Reply to Gil and Ajit: Simple Commodity Production/ "Contemporary society" Ajit Sinha (Wed May 17 2000 - 01:55:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3240] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: starting points Ajit Sinha (Wed May 17 2000 - 02:06:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3241] Foucault on authorship JERRY LEVY (Wed May 17 2000 - 07:42:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3242] starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 17 2000 - 10:35:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3243] Re: process & subjects Jerry Levy (Wed May 17 2000 - 11:12:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3244] starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 17 2000 - 11:38:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3245] Re: Re: Re: Re: Spinoza Andrew_Kliman (Wed May 17 2000 - 14:43:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3246] Re: Re: process & subjects Paul Cockshott (Wed May 17 2000 - 17:33:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3247] Re: Re: Re: process & subjects JERRY LEVY (Wed May 17 2000 - 20:43:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3248] Re: Re: Re: Re: process & subjects Allin Cottrell (Wed May 17 2000 - 22:53:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3249] Re: Re: Re: Re: process & subjects Paul Cockshott (Thu May 18 2000 - 06:53:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3250] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: process & subjects Paul Cockshott (Thu May 18 2000 - 06:54:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3251] Re: Re: Re: process & subjects Paul Cockshott (Thu May 18 2000 - 07:31:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3252] Re: Re: Re: Re: process & subjects Paul Cockshott (Thu May 18 2000 - 07:38:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3253] Re: starting points Ajit Sinha (Thu May 18 2000 - 07:48:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3254] Re: Re: starting points Paul Cockshott (Thu May 18 2000 - 08:42:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3255] the quantification of misery JERRY LEVY (Thu May 18 2000 - 07:26:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3256] Re: Re: starting points JERRY LEVY (Thu May 18 2000 - 09:46:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3257] robots and value JERRY LEVY (Thu May 18 2000 - 09:59:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3258] RE: robots and value Michael Williams (Thu May 18 2000 - 12:40:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3259] Message from David Laibman glevy@acnet.pratt.edu (Thu May 18 2000 - 12:50:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3260] Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 18 2000 - 13:08:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3261] Re: Two visions of Marx's "starting point" Fred B. Moseley (Thu May 18 2000 - 15:06:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3262] Re: Spinoza [partial reply to Andrew] Paul Zarembka (Thu May 18 2000 - 13:46:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3263] Re: Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 18 2000 - 17:40:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3264] Dunayevskaya (was Spinoza) Andrew_Kliman (Thu May 18 2000 - 19:46:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3265] Re: Dunayevskaya (was Spinoza) Paul Zarembka (Thu May 18 2000 - 21:12:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3266] Re: Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 18 2000 - 22:50:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3267] Gil's criticisms Fred B. Moseley (Thu May 18 2000 - 23:45:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3268] robots and value Asfilho@aol.com (Fri May 19 2000 - 02:13:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3269] Re: robots and value JERRY LEVY (Fri May 19 2000 - 07:20:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3271] Re: Re: Re: starting points Duncan K. Foley (Fri May 19 2000 - 18:14:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3270] Re: Re: Slavery Duncan K. Foley (Fri May 19 2000 - 18:31:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3272] Re: Re: Re: Slavery Patrick L. Mason (Fri May 19 2000 - 20:19:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3273] RE: RE: Simple Commodity Production Michael Williams (Sat May 20 2000 - 06:32:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3274] Re: Gil's criticisms Paul Zarembka (Sat May 20 2000 - 08:17:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3275] the clone mode of production? JERRY LEVY (Sat May 20 2000 - 07:45:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3276] Accelerated ACcumulation Rakesh Bhandari (Sat May 20 2000 - 14:47:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3277] Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Ajit Sinha (Sun May 21 2000 - 08:01:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3278] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Sun May 21 2000 - 12:59:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3279] Re: robots and value Steve Keen (Mon May 22 2000 - 06:15:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3280] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Allin Cottrell (Sun May 21 2000 - 23:38:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3281] RE: Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk (Mon May 22 2000 - 08:16:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3282] Re: Two prefaces Fred B. Moseley (Mon May 22 2000 - 10:03:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3283] productive and unproductive economists glevy@acnet.pratt.edu (Mon May 22 2000 - 11:15:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3284] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 22 2000 - 13:29:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3285] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 22 2000 - 13:30:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3286] Re: Re: Two prefaces Paul Zarembka (Mon May 22 2000 - 13:46:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3287] Re: Production for Production's Sake (was Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*) Paul Zarembka (Mon May 22 2000 - 14:42:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3288] Dunayevskaya on Luxemburg Paul Zarembka (Mon May 22 2000 - 15:04:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3289] Re: Dunayevskaya on Luxemburg JERRY LEVY (Mon May 22 2000 - 16:41:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3290] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Allin Cottrell (Mon May 22 2000 - 20:09:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3291] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 23 2000 - 00:57:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3292] Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Paul Cockshott (Tue May 23 2000 - 05:55:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3293] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk (Tue May 23 2000 - 05:59:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3294] Re: productive and unproductive economists glevy@acnet.pratt.edu (Tue May 23 2000 - 12:47:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3295] CFP: MARXISM 2000 -- extended deadline 15 July Stephen Cullenberg (Tue May 23 2000 - 16:03:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3296] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 23 2000 - 16:56:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3297] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 23 2000 - 17:19:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3298] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Accelerated ACcumulation Paul Cockshott (Wed May 24 2000 - 04:36:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3299] Re: objectivity of value Paul Cockshott (Wed May 24 2000 - 05:46:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3300] RE: Re: objectivity of value Michael Williams (Wed May 24 2000 - 07:20:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3301] Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Paul Zarembka (Wed May 24 2000 - 09:27:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3302] Re: Accelerated ACcumulation [Luxemburg on Bauer] Paul Zarembka (Wed May 24 2000 - 09:30:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3303] Re: productive and unproductive economists JERRY LEVY (Wed May 24 2000 - 06:12:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3304] Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Allin Cottrell (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:02:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3305] Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Paul Cockshott (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:07:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3306] Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:06:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3307] Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Allin Cottrell (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:06:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3308] Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Paul Cockshott (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:11:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3309] Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Paul Zarembka (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:20:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3310] Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Paul Cockshott (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:49:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3311] Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be michael@ecst.csuchico.edu (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:58:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3312] measurement of value Andrew Brown (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:56:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3313] Mattick on Luxemburg Paul Zarembka (Wed May 24 2000 - 11:11:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3314] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be Paul Cockshott (Wed May 24 2000 - 11:20:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3315] Measurement of value Asfilho@aol.com (Wed May 24 2000 - 13:38:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3316] Re: Measurement of value Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 24 2000 - 14:18:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3317] Re: measurement of value Allin Cottrell (Wed May 24 2000 - 15:08:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3318] Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 24 2000 - 15:41:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3319] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplusvalue be Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 16:46:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3320] Replies Andrew_Kliman (Wed May 24 2000 - 13:30:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3321] Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 24 2000 - 17:13:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3322] Re: Re: Measurement of value Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 17:27:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 24 2000 - 17:44:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3324] Re: Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 17:59:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3325] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 24 2000 - 18:56:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3326] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 19:18:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3327] Measuring values Allin Cottrell (Wed May 24 2000 - 19:37:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3328] Re: Measuring values Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 20:25:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3329] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 24 2000 - 22:22:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3330] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value michael@ecst.csuchico.edu (Wed May 24 2000 - 21:28:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3331] Re: Re: Measuring values Patrick L. Mason (Wed May 24 2000 - 22:31:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3332] Re: Re: Re: Measuring values Michael Perelman (Wed May 24 2000 - 21:44:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3333] Re: Re: productive and unproductive economists Duncan K. Foley (Wed May 24 2000 - 23:12:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3334] Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Rakesh Bhandari (Wed May 24 2000 - 23:54:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3335] Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value michael@ecst.csuchico.edu (Thu May 25 2000 - 00:15:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3336] Re: objectivity of value Chai-on Lee (Thu May 25 2000 - 00:37:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3337] Measurement of value Asfilho@aol.com (Thu May 25 2000 - 00:56:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3338] Re: Re: Measurement of value, computer depreciation Paul Cockshott (Thu May 25 2000 - 05:33:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3339] Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Ajit Sinha (Thu May 25 2000 - 07:51:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3340] Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Ajit Sinha (Thu May 25 2000 - 08:02:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3341] Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Paul Zarembka (Thu May 25 2000 - 10:04:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3342] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value, computerdepreciation Michael Perelman (Thu May 25 2000 - 10:44:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3343] Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 12:08:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3344] Re: Measurement of value Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 12:24:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3345] Re: Re: Re: Re: starting points [can surplus value be measured?] Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 12:28:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3346] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity ofvalue Michael Perelman (Thu May 25 2000 - 11:36:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3347] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 25 2000 - 11:46:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3348] Re: Critique glevy@acnet.pratt.edu (Thu May 25 2000 - 12:57:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3349] Re: Critique JERRY LEVY (Thu May 25 2000 - 13:57:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3350] Re: objectivity of value Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 14:16:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3351] Re: objectivity of value Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 14:22:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3352] Re: Re: objectivity of value Michael Perelman (Thu May 25 2000 - 15:38:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3353] Re: Critique John Holloway (Thu May 25 2000 - 16:45:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3354] Re: Critique JERRY LEVY (Thu May 25 2000 - 16:01:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3355] Re: Re: Critique Paul Cockshott (Thu May 25 2000 - 18:57:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3356] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 21:14:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3357] Re: Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value Michael Perelman (Thu May 25 2000 - 20:28:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3358] objectivity of value Patrick L. Mason (Thu May 25 2000 - 22:52:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3359] John Holloway's "Grundrisse" Paul Zarembka (Thu May 25 2000 - 19:42:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3360] Re: objectivity of value Michael Perelman (Thu May 25 2000 - 23:06:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3361] Re: objectivity of value Rakesh Bhandari (Thu May 25 2000 - 23:40:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3362] Re: Re: objectivity of value Michael Perelman (Fri May 26 2000 - 00:33:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3363] Re: Re: Two visions of Marx's "starting point" Gil Skillman (Fri May 26 2000 - 18:08:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3364] Re: Gil's criticisms Gil Skillman (Sat May 27 2000 - 17:50:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3365] Re: Re: Gil's criticisms Gil Skillman (Sat May 27 2000 - 18:55:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3366] Reply to first part of Gil in [3365] Paul Zarembka (Sun May 28 2000 - 12:38:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3367] Re: Reply to first part of Gil in [3365] Gil Skillman (Sun May 28 2000 - 16:42:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3368] Re: Re: Reply to first part of Gil in [3365] Paul Zarembka (Sun May 28 2000 - 17:32:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3369] Re: Re: Re: Reply to first part of Gil in [3365] Gil Skillman (Sun May 28 2000 - 20:47:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3370] further replies to Gil Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 29 2000 - 11:45:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3371] further replies to Gil Rakesh Bhandari (Mon May 29 2000 - 13:16:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3372] Re: Re: Gil's criticisms Fred B. Moseley (Tue May 30 2000 - 00:13:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3373] Re: Mattick on Luxemburg Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 30 2000 - 03:21:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3374] Re: Re: Mattick on Luxemburg Paul Zarembka (Tue May 30 2000 - 12:04:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3375] Re: Re: Re: Gil's criticisms Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 30 2000 - 13:07:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3376] Re: Re: Re: Mattick on Luxemburg Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 30 2000 - 13:21:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3377] Re: Re: Two visions of Marx's "starting point" Gil Skillman (Tue May 30 2000 - 13:42:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3378] Gil's necessary conditions michael a. lebowitz (Tue May 30 2000 - 14:57:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3379] RE: Two visions of Marx's "starting point" Michael Williams (Tue May 30 2000 - 17:06:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3380] Re: further replies to Gil Gil Skillman (Tue May 30 2000 - 17:26:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3381] Re: RE: Two visions of Marx's "starting point" Gil Skillman (Tue May 30 2000 - 18:03:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3382] Re: Gil's necessary conditions Gil Skillman (Tue May 30 2000 - 19:30:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3383] Re: Re: further replies to Gil Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 30 2000 - 22:44:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3384] Re: Re: Gil's necessary conditions Gil Skillman (Tue May 30 2000 - 23:38:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3385] Re: further replies to Gil Gil Skillman (Tue May 30 2000 - 23:45:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3386] Re: Re: further replies to Gil Rakesh Bhandari (Tue May 30 2000 - 23:52:57 EDT)

Last message date: Tue May 30 2000 - 23:52:53 EDT
Archived on: Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:12 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:12 EDT