[ show plain text ]
> Given the explicit assumption of Capital, Volume One which also obtains
> for most of Volumes Two and Three, I don't see the transformation problem
> as important.
>
> Wasn't it Shaikh who first referred to a 930rices of production as
> reflective of values? Why not just take it as 100% and move on to other
> issues?
I would side with you here. All the empirical studies that I know of apart
from Steedmans back this up, many even more strongly.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 00:00:04 EDT