[OPE-L:4225] Re: Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx

From: Andrew_Kliman (Andrew_Kliman@email.msn.com)
Date: Sun Oct 22 2000 - 15:58:17 EDT


In reply to OPE-L 4223,

Rakesh, my understanding is that, in Marx's theory, the cost-price is
the sum of used-up constant capital and variable capital.  Thus the
comment

"the price of production will differ from the value, not only because p
differs from s, but also because k diverges from the value of its
(material) elements"

implies that the used-up constant capital value diverges from the value
of its (material) elements.

I also think that, in Marx's theory, the amount of value that is
transferred to the product is the used-up constant capital value.  See,
e.g., Vol. I, Ch. 8.

Hence, the amount of value that is transferred to the product diverges
from the value of the (material) elements of the constant capital.


Maybe a direct answer to your question "Why is not "the value of the
means of production consumed", not [but???] their cost price, which
determines the value transferred from the means of production by labor to
the output?" may help.  If I understand the question, my answer is that
cost price is a transformed form of the value of used-up constant capital
(plus variable capital), and it is the value of used-up constant capital
that is transferred to the product.  The value of the used-up means of
production is NOT what is transferred.


Andrew Kliman



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EST