ope-l-0010
By Date

Starting: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 04:34:28 EDT
Ending: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 23:22:46 EST

• [OPE-L:3916] Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Ajit Sinha (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 04:30:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3917] Fwd: Re: Re: Marxists AND Sraffians Misinterpreting Sraffa Rakesh Bhandari (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 06:58:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3918] Re: The Transformation Problem 1 Ajit Sinha (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 07:10:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3919] Re: The Transformation Problem 2 Ajit Sinha (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 07:16:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3920] Re: The Transformation Problem Ajit Sinha (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 07:24:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3921] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 09:14:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3922] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 09:20:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3923] Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 09:35:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3924] Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 09:41:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3925] Re: Re: Marxists AND Sraffians Misinterpreting Sraffa Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 10:22:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3926] Re: Fwd: Marxists AND Sraffians Misinterpreting Sraffa Michael Perelman (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 11:18:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3927] Grossmann Rakesh Bhandari (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 12:35:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3928] Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Paul Cockshott (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:31:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3929] Re: Re: Marxists AND Sraffians Misinterpreting Sraffa Paul Cockshott (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 17:31:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3930] Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Gil Skillman (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 18:49:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3931] Re: Re: Re: Marxists AND Sraffians Misinterpreting Sraffa Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 01 2000 - 21:58:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3932] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Ajit Sinha (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:43:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3933] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory clyder (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 05:17:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3934] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Ajit Sinha (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 05:15:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3935] Re: Re: Marxists AND Sraffians Misinterpreting Sraffa Steve Keen (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 21:09:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3936] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 10:28:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3937] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Gil Skillman (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 12:41:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3938] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Steve Keen (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:48:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3939] Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Gil Skillman (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 13:16:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3940] validity of Ricardian law of value Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 14:42:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3941] value of money Rakesh Bhandari (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:33:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3942] Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Tsoulfidis Lefteris (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 03:58:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3943] Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Ajit Sinha (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:04:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3944] Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Tsoulfidis Lefteris (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 04:47:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3945] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Ajit Sinha (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 08:04:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3946] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 08:51:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3947] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem clyder (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 10:29:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3948] French students' letter: the translation (fwd) glevy@pratt.edu (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 10:32:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3949] Re: A question: [Was The Transformation Problem] Michael Perelman (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 11:33:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3950] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 14:08:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3951] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Patrick L. Mason (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 15:18:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3952] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Allin Cottrell (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 16:05:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3953] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The TransformationProblem Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 16:40:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3954] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The TransformationProblem Allin Cottrell (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 18:11:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3955] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 18:39:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3956] Dynamic value: Samuelson Allin Cottrell (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 20:24:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3958] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Duncan K. Foley (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 21:58:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3957] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Duncan K. Foley (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 22:04:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3959] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Allin Cottrell (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 22:27:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3960] :TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Bhandari (Wed Oct 04 2000 - 23:11:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3961] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 00:25:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3962] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Ajit Sinha (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 02:10:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3963] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Ajit Sinha (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 03:35:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3964] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Tsoulfidis Lefteris (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 03:43:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3965] Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Simon Mohun (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 05:27:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3966] Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Ajit Sinha (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 07:43:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3967] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 09:27:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3968] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Allin Cottrell (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 10:45:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3969] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Simon Mohun (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 11:33:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3970] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 12:16:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3971] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 12:21:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3973] Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:23:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3972] Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Bhandari (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:22:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3974] moral depreciation and the working day Allin Cottrell (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 15:10:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3975] Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Steve Keen (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 10:36:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3976] Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Steve Keen (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 10:29:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3977] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Gil Skillman (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 17:02:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3978] Re: Fundamental Un-Marxian Theorem Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:10:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3979] Re: TheTransformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:12:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3980] Re: The Transformation Problem 2 Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:12:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3981] Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Ajit Sinha (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:57:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3982] Re: Re: The Transformation Problem 2 Ajit Sinha (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:05:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3983] Re: Re: TheTransformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem John Ernst (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:15:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3984] Re: Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Steve Keen (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 20:49:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3985] (no subject) Rakesh Bhandari (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:55:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3986] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem clyder (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 05:23:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3987] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem Patrick L. Mason (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 08:59:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3988] Re: Re: Re: The Transformation Problem 2 Andrew_Kliman (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 10:22:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3989] flames glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 11:27:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3990] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 15:11:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3991] Re: Re: Fundamental Un-Marxian Theorem Gil Skillman (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:47:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3992] Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:48:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3993] A Comment on Allin's Work on Moral Depreciation John Ernst (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 19:11:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3994] Re: A Comment on Allin's Work on Moral Depreciation Allin Cottrell (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 20:20:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3995] Re: (no subject) Allin Cottrell (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 20:41:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3996] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Duncan K. Foley (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:36:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3997] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Duncan K. Foley (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 22:38:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3998] Re: e: m in Marxs theory Duncan K. Foley (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:02:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:3999] Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Fred B. Moseley (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 00:23:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4000] Re: Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Fred B. Moseley (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 00:59:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4001] Re: Re: Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Gil Skillman (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 01:09:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4002] transforming the inputs (was no subject) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 01:16:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4003] Re: Re: e: m in Marxs theory Gil Skillman (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 03:03:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4004] Re: Re: Re: e: m in Marxs theory Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 04:13:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4005] Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Steve Keen (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 10:16:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4006] Re: Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Steve Keen (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 10:26:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4007] Re: Re: Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Fred B. Moseley (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 23:52:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4008] Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 00:03:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4009] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Ajit Sinha (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 06:14:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4010] Re: Re: TheTransformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Tsoulfidis Lefteris (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 09:28:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4011] Re: The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 10:24:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4012] Re: Re: Re: TheTransformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Paul Zarembka (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 11:18:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4013] Re: Re: The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Tsoulfidis Lefteris (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 12:28:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4014] Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Tsoulfidis Lefteris (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 12:30:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4015] The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Alejandro Ramos (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 13:50:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4016] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Surplus value or surplus argument? Steve Keen (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 08:38:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4017] Re: The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 15:21:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4018] Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Allin Cottrell (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 15:27:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4019] The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Alejandro Ramos (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 16:42:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4020] RE: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Chai-on Lee (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 20:16:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4021] Re: RE: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Allin Cottrell (Sun Oct 08 2000 - 21:49:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4022] Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:26:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4023] Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 02:31:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4024] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marxs theory Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:25:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4025] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:29:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4026] Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 05:35:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4027] Re: Re: The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 05:56:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4028] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TheTransformationProblem Steve Keen (Tue Oct 10 2000 - 01:31:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4029] RE: Re: RE: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Chai-on Lee (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 09:57:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4030] TheTransformationProblem Alejandro Ramos (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 10:02:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4031] Re: m in Marxs theory [Actually now about Grossman] Paul Zarembka (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 10:21:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4032] Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 11:30:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4033] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: transforming the inputs Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 11:47:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4034] Re: The Transformation Non-Problem and theNon-Transformation Problem Andrew_Kliman (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 13:19:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4035] Carta estudiantes franceses: traducción al castellano valle@servidor.unam.mx (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 14:54:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4036] Re: Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 15:28:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4037] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 16:27:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4038] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 17:47:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4039] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs (was no subject) Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 20:00:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4040] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: transforming the inputs Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 09 2000 - 20:07:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4041] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: transforming the inputs Chai-on Lee (Thu Dec 31 1998 - 14:06:08 EST)
• [OPE-L:4042] [Actually now about Grossman] Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 02:02:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4043] TheTransformationProblem Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 03:14:43 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4044] RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 08:00:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4045] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Andrew_Kliman (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 08:35:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4046] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory clyder (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 08:18:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4047] Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory clyder (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 08:20:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4048] Lefteris glevy@pratt.edu (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 13:05:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4049] Revaluation Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 14:15:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4050] Lefteris Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 14:16:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4051] Re: TheTransformationProblem Steve Keen (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 16:26:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4053] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Steve Keen (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 16:30:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4052] Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Steve Keen (Wed Oct 11 2000 - 16:31:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4054] RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 06:37:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4055] Classifying industries P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 09:00:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4056] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 09:13:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4057] Revaluation John Ernst (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 10:15:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4058] RE: Revaluation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 10:53:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4059] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Fred B. Moseley (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 10:59:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4060] RE: Revaluation John Ernst (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 11:14:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4061] Revaluation Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 11:51:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4062] RE: RE: Revaluation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 11:59:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4063] RE: RE: RE: Revaluation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 12:27:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4064] Transforming the inputs (was revaluation) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 13:55:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4065] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 14:23:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4066] Internet Seminar about Marx's Method using Bhaskar Hans Ehrbar (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 14:29:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4067] Zhiyong Dong glevy@pratt.edu (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 14:36:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4068] Revaluation John Ernst (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 15:06:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4069] Re: Re: Re: Re: e: m in Marxs theory Gil Skillman (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 15:13:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4070] Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: m in Marx's theory Paul Cockshott (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 15:47:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4071] Re: Revaluation Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 17:38:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4072] Zhiyong Dong Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 17:45:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4074] Re: Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 16:00:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4073] Re: Classifying industries Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 15:56:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4075] Re: Re: Revaluation Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 19:47:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4076] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: e: m in Marxs theory Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 19:50:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4077] Revaluation Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 20:32:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4078] Re: Revaluation Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 20:58:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4079] Revaluation John Ernst (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 00:33:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4080] Re: RE: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 21:52:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4081] RE: Revaluation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 06:57:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4082] ~{;X84~}: [OPE-L:4072] Zhiyong Don dongzy (Thu Oct 12 2000 - 21:52:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4083] Re: Revaluation glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 11:03:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4084] Depreciation -- in Marx's German and elsewhere P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 11:20:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4085] distribution of organic composition Allin Cottrell (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 21:10:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4086] Re: Zhiyong Dong Alejandro Valle Baeza (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 23:29:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4087] Corntamination Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 16:06:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4088] Revaluation John Ernst (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 16:29:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4089] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 14 2000 - 22:34:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4090] difference between value and absolute value dongzy (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 03:35:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4091] Revaluation John Ernst (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 10:24:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4092] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 11:35:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4093] Re: Re: Revaluation John Ernst (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 13:26:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4094] Re: Re: Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 16:56:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4095] Re: Re: Revaluation Steve Keen (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:06:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4096] Re: Re: Re: Revaluation michael@ECST.CSUCHICO.EDU (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 19:42:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4097] Revaluation John Ernst (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 20:50:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4098] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 22:45:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4099] Part Two of Volume III of Capital Duncan K. Foley (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 22:55:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4100] Re: Revaluation (Steve) John Ernst (Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:14:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4101] Revaluation John Ernst (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 00:05:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4102] Re: Revaluation Alejandro Ramos (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 00:32:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4103] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 02:41:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4104] Re: Re: Revaluation (Steve) Steve Keen (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 03:31:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4105] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Ajit Sinha (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 07:41:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4107] VIRUS ALERT! re OPEL 4106 Andrew Brown (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 08:17:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4108] (Fwd) Re: VIRUS ALERT! re OPEL 4106 Andrew Brown (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 09:59:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4109] Re: [Re: Re: Re: Revaluation] Jerry Levy (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 10:50:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4110] Re: (no subject) Duncan K. Foley (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:03:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4111] Re: Re: Revaluation (Steve) Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:29:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4112] Re: Re: [Re: Re: Re: Revaluation] michael@ECST.CSUCHICO.EDU (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 12:36:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4113] Re: Revaluation] glevy@pratt.edu (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 12:57:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4114] use value and value ECUSERS (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:32:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4115] Re: Re: Re: Revaluation (Steve) Steve Keen (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 15:18:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4116] Re: use value and value Steve Keen (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 15:26:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4117] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 14:58:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4118] iterative transformation Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 15:19:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4119] Ingrao & Lippi Alejandro Ramos (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 15:45:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4120] Re: use value and value michael@ECST.CSUCHICO.EDU (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 20:03:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4121] Re: Re: use value and value ECUSERS (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 20:48:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4122] Re: Re: Re: use value and value Michael Perelman (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 21:08:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4123] Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value Steve Keen (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 22:33:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4124] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value Michael Perelman (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 21:51:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4125] Use Value and Value John Ernst (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 23:26:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4126] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value Steve Keen (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 00:24:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4127] Re: Use Value and Value Michael Perelman (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 23:44:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4128] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value Michael Perelman (Mon Oct 16 2000 - 23:52:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4129] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value Steve Keen (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 01:52:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4130] Re: Re: (no subject) Ajit Sinha (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 01:00:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4132] Re: (no subject) Steve Keen (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 02:29:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4133] iterative transformation Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 02:32:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4134] Re: Ingrao & Lippi Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 02:48:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4135] Re: Re: use value and value Andrew Brown (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 07:11:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4136] RE: Re: Re: (no subject) Paul Cockshott (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 07:42:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4137] (Fwd) Re: Re: Re: use value and value Andrew Brown (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:40:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4138] Re: Re: Re: use value and value Andrew Brown (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:43:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4139] Re: Ingrao & Lippi riccardo bellofiore (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:51:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4140] Re: Re: Re: (no subject) Allin Cottrell (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:11:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4141] RE: Re: Re: Re: (no subject) Michael Williams (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:45:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4142] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Andrew_Kliman (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:55:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4143] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 13:59:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4144] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value TonyTinker (Tue Oct 17 2000 - 23:35:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4145] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use value and value Steve Keen (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 09:33:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4146] Re: (Fwd) Re: Re: Re: use value and value Steve Keen (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 09:24:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4147] Re: Re: Ingrao & Lippi Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 09:45:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4148] Re: Re: Revaluation glevy@pratt.edu (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 10:55:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4149] Re: Use Value and Value glevy@pratt.edu (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 11:26:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4150] RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:04:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4151] RE: Revaluation P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:20:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4152] Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:04:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4153] Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 01:14:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4154] Re: Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Steve Keen (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 02:52:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4155] Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 05:11:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4156] Revaluation John Ernst (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 05:18:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4157] (Fwd) Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 06:40:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4158] (Fwd) Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 06:46:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4159] Re: (Fwd) Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Steve Keen (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 08:53:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4160] Re: Re: (Fwd) Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] nicola taylor (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 09:14:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4161] Re: Who agrees with Popper? Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 09:49:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4162] Re: Re: Re: Ingrao & Lippi riccardo bellofiore (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:59:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4163] Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:12:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4164] Re: Re: Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:39:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4165] Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 10:49:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4166] Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] glevy@pratt.edu (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 14:43:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4167] Who agrees with Popper? P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 16:11:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4168] Re: Who agrees with Popper? Patrick L. Mason (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 16:44:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4169] falsifiability Michael Perelman (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 17:04:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4170] Re: Re: Re: (Fwd) Re: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Steve Keen (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:03:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4171] Re: Who agrees with Popper? Steve Keen (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:12:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4172] Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? Steve Keen (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 18:15:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4173] Re: falsifiability Allin Cottrell (Thu Oct 19 2000 - 21:15:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4174] Ingrao & Lippi Alejandro Ramos (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 00:19:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4175] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 01:24:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4176] : RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 01:43:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4177] Re: Ingrao & Lippi riccardo bellofiore (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 06:14:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4178] Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? Andrew Brown (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 06:41:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4179] Who agrees with Popper? Well, not the Bayesians P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 08:33:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4180] Re: Who agrees with Popper? glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 11:27:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4181] Re: Re: falsifiability Patrick L. Mason (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 11:37:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4182] Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? OPE-L:4154] glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 11:41:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4183] Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 12:05:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4184] Re: Part II of Volume III of Capital Jerry Levy (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 12:13:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4185] Re: Who agrees with Popper? Jerry Levy (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 12:16:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4186] Re: Part II of Volume 3 of Capital Jerry Levy (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 12:19:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4187] Re: Re: Part II of Volume 3 of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 13:32:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4188] Re: Re: Re: falsifiability Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 15:22:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4189] Re: : RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Steve Keen (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 22:39:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4190] Re: Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? Steve Keen (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 23:07:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4191] Re: Who agrees with Popper? Well, not the Bayesians Steve Keen (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 23:09:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4192] Re: Re: Re: Re: falsifiability Steve Keen (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 23:12:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4193] Re: Re: Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? nicola taylor (Fri Oct 20 2000 - 23:41:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4194] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Fred B. Moseley (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 00:10:09 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4195] Re: Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? Fred B. Moseley (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 00:12:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4196] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who agrees with Popper? Steve Keen (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 01:12:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4197] Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:46:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4198] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 03:57:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4199] Who agrees with Popper? Alejandro Ramos (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 11:58:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4200] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 12:36:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4201] Bayesian confirmationism P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 13:52:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4202] Re: Bayesian confirmationism Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 14:19:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4203] Revaluation John Ernst (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 16:36:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4204] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 16:43:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4205] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 17:41:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4206] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Steve Keen (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:47:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4207] Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Duncan K. Foley (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 17:39:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4208] Re: Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Duncan K. Foley (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 16:50:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4209] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Duncan K. Foley (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 17:38:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4210] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:28:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4211] Re: Re: RE: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:32:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4212] Re: Revaluation Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 17:45:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4213] Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 18:44:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4214] Re: Re: Logic and illogic indefending Marx Rakesh Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 19:09:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4215] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:37:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4216] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:48:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4217] Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 23:55:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4218] Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Steve Keen (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 08:32:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4219] Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Steve Keen (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 09:05:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4220] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 09:17:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4221] Re: Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 09:56:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4222] Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 13:12:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4223] Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 13:30:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4224] Revaluation John Ernst (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 13:31:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4225] Re: Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 15:58:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4226] Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 16:40:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4227] Re: Re: Re: Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 17:06:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4228] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Steve Keen (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 18:53:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4229] Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 19:26:49 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4230] Logic and illogic in defending Marx Alejandro Ramos (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:38:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4231] Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 22:42:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4232] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:21:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4233] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:27:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4234] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Steve Keen (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 04:09:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4235] RE: Who agrees with Popper? [re OPE-L:4154] Paul Cockshott (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 05:20:29 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4236] RE: Re: Re: Part II of Volume 3 of Capital Paul Cockshott (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 06:20:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4237] RE: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Paul Cockshott (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 06:20:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4238] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx glevy@pratt.edu (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 11:09:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4239] Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Paul Zarembka (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 12:23:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4240] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital TonyTinker (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 15:02:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4241] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Paul Zarembka (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 15:36:04 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4242] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Gil Skillman (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 15:45:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4243] Fwd: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Gil Skillman (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 16:14:19 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4244] Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 17:37:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4245] Re: RE: Interest rates in Japan [re OPE-L:4154] Steve Keen (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 20:42:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4246] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 20:57:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4247] Re: Re: RE: Interest rates in Japan [re OPE-L:4154] Akira MATSUMOTO (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 20:36:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4248] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:14:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4249] Re: Re: Re: RE: Interest rates in Japan [re OPE-L:4154] Steve Keen (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:35:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4250] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Gil Skillman (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 21:45:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4251] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Interest rates in Japan [re OPE-L:4154] Akira MATSUMOTO (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:16:45 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4252] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 23 2000 - 22:46:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4253] Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 03:47:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4254] Seve on the worthlessness of Alejandro Ramos (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 03:55:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4255] Questions to Gil (4243) John Ernst (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 03:58:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4256] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of VolumeIII of Capital Paul Cockshott (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 06:29:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4257] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 06:36:05 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4258] Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 08:45:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4259] Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of VolumeIII of Capital Paul Zarembka (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 09:13:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4260] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Paul Zarembka (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 09:37:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4261] Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:07:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4262] Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 14:26:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4263] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 16:37:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4264] Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 10:59:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4265] Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 18:20:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4266] Re: Questions to Gil (4243) Gil Skillman (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 19:02:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4267] Questions to Gil (4243) Alejandro Ramos (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 20:36:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4268] Logic and illogic in defending Marx Alejandro Ramos (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 20:36:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4269] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Allin Cottrell (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 21:31:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4270] Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 21:38:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4271] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 16:23:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4272] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of VolumeIII of Capital TonyTinker (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 00:50:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4273] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Allin Cottrell (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 23:16:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4274] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Paul Zarembka (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 22:36:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4275] Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 19:08:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4276] Re: Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Allin Cottrell (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 09:53:42 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4277] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx (fwd) glevy@pratt.edu (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 10:58:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4278] Re: Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Paul Zarembka (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 13:35:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4281] Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 19:45:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4283] Steve on the worthlessness of labor Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:14:21 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4284] Steve on the worthlessness of labor at Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:16:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4285] Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:18:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4282] Logic and illogic in defending Marx Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 22:58:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4286] Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:32:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4287] Re: Logic and illogic in defending Marx Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 00:07:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4288] Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 00:07:25 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4289] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Wed Oct 25 2000 - 15:39:55 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4290] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor Steve Keen (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 02:17:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4291] Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:34:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4292] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:44:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4293] Fw: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of VolumeIII of Capital TonyTinker (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:10:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4294] Re: Re: Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value TonyTinker (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 01:54:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4295] Re: Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 03:39:18 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4296] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 03:55:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4297] Re: Marx and machines Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 06:33:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4298] Re: Doh! Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 06:41:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4299] Re: Re: Doh! Steve Keen (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 08:24:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4300] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at Allin Cottrell (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 07:59:26 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4301] Re: machines and quantity Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 08:35:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4302] Re: Re: machines and quantity Steve Keen (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 03:31:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4303] Re: SV, labour and machines Andrew Brown (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 10:01:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4304] Re:Steve on the worthlessness of labor at glevy@pratt.edu (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:08:10 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4305] Virtual Book Seminar on MARX'S ECOLOGY (fwd) glevy@pratt.edu (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:22:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4306] Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital glevy@pratt.edu (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:35:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4307] Re: Re: SV, labour and machines Steve Keen (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 09:00:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4308] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 15:40:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4309] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Allin Cottrell (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 16:03:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4310] Price-Value Equivalence! [was "Logic and illogic in defending Marx"] Paul Zarembka (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 20:41:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4311] Re: Price-Value Equivalence! [was "Logic and illogic in defending Marx"] Andrew_Kliman (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 21:32:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4312] Price-Value Equivalence! Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 21:44:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4313] Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Paul Zarembka (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 22:43:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4314] Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 23:21:03 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4315] Price-Value Equivalence! Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 23:28:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4316] Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Alejandro Ramos (Thu Oct 26 2000 - 23:50:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4317] sundry Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 02:42:54 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4318] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 20:27:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4319] Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of VolumeIII of Capital Paul Cockshott (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 04:37:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4320] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Paul Cockshott (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 04:49:57 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4321] Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Andrew_Kliman (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 05:16:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4322] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Andrew_Kliman (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 05:52:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4323] Re: Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Paul Zarembka (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 08:38:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4324] Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Paul Zarembka (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 08:39:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4325] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 08:51:59 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4326] anarchy of the market glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 10:53:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4327] Re: SV, labour and machines Andrew Brown (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 11:00:35 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4328] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Paul Cockshott (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 11:01:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4329] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 12:05:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4330] Re: Re: SV, labour and machines Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 12:35:14 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4331] Re: SV, labour and machines Andrew Brown (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 13:40:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4332] Re: Re: Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor as the source of surplus value Steve Keen (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 09:11:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4333] Re: Re: SV, labour and machines Steve Keen (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 09:50:47 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4334] Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Andrew_Kliman (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 19:39:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4335] Re: Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Paul Zarembka (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 21:10:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4336] Survey Alejandro Ramos (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 21:58:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4337] Re: Survey nicola taylor (Fri Oct 27 2000 - 23:34:20 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4338] Re: Survey riccardo bellofiore (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 05:49:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4339] Re: Re: Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 07:14:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4340] Fw: Can Humanity Free Itself from Global Capitalism? Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 08:50:37 EDT)
• Fw: Can Humanity Free Itself from Global Capitalism? Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 08:50:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4341] Re: Re: Re: Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Paul Zarembka (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 09:51:24 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4342] Trades persons and value P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 12:20:07 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4343] Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Andrew_Kliman (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 12:23:41 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4344] Technical change and general truths P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 13:02:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4345] Spheres and industries P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 13:22:28 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4346] Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 13:40:27 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4347] Re: SV, labour and machines Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Oct 28 2000 - 13:45:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:4351] Re: 'natural price' Andrew Brown (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 10:28:55 EST)
• [OPE-L:4349] Re: Technical change and general truths Steve Keen (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 20:22:20 EST)
• [OPE-L:4348] Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Steve Keen (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 20:32:33 EST)
• [OPE-L:4350] Re: Technical change and general truths Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 05:55:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4352] Re: SV, labour and machines Andrew Brown (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 11:51:15 EST)
• [OPE-L:4353] Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:24:00 EST)
• [OPE-L:4354] Re: Re: 'natural price' Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:56:49 EST)
• [OPE-L:4355] Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Steve Keen (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 08:49:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:4356] Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 14:47:32 EST)
• [OPE-L:4357] Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Andrew_Kliman (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 15:32:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:4358] Re: 'natural price' Andrew Brown (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 16:22:50 EST)
• [OPE-L:4359] Re: Re: Price-Value Equivalence! Paul Zarembka (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 17:18:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4360] Re: Spheres and industries Patrick L. Mason (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 19:36:51 EST)
• [OPE-L:4361] Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Allin Cottrell (Sun Oct 29 2000 - 20:38:10 EST)
• [OPE-L:4362] Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 02:56:32 EST)
• [OPE-L:4363] Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 05:33:23 EST)
• [OPE-L:4364] Re: Re: growth rates Paul Cockshott (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 06:37:31 EST)
• [OPE-L:4365] Re: Trades persons and value Paul Cockshott (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 06:47:22 EST)
• [OPE-L:4366] Call for Papers - Association of Heterodox Economics A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 06:56:37 EST)
• [OPE-L:4367] Re: Part Two of Volume III of Capital Fred B. Moseley (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 07:16:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4368] Re: Technical change and general truths glevy@pratt.edu (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 10:44:40 EST)
• [OPE-L:4369] Re: Re: Re: growth rates Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 10:45:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:4370] Re: Survey glevy@pratt.edu (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 10:58:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:4371] Re: Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Steve Keen (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 06:37:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4372] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 13:11:41 EST)
• [OPE-L:4373] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Steve Keen (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 11:37:03 EST)
• [OPE-L:4374] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 18:20:15 EST)
• [OPE-L:4375] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Steve Keen (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 16:12:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4376] Re: Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Allin Cottrell (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 22:25:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:4377] Re: Re: Re: Technical change and general truths Andrew_Kliman (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 23:21:30 EST)

Last message date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 23:22:46 EST
Archived on: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:13 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:13 EST