"Fred B. Moseley" wrote: > Yes, this is what I was trying to tell Ajit a while back. There are n > transformation multipliers in this interpretation, which is different from > Marx's m for the economy as a whole. ________________________ Fred, My critique of your interpretation should have sent you to square one. So why not work on that, rather than waste time on such non-issues? There is no fundamental difference between Bortkiewcz and Dickerson's positions. And both of them have understood the problem well. Cheers, ajit sinha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 00:00:04 EST