[OPE-L:4465] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?

From: glevy@pratt.edu
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 12:55:22 EST

Next message: Alejandro Ramos: "[OPE-L:4466] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
Previous message: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari: "[OPE-L:4464] Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
Next in thread: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:4467] Re: Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Reply: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:4467] Re: Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Reply: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari: "[OPE-L:4471] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rakesh wrote in [OPE-L:4464]:

> Though a neo Ricardian, Allin does not understand this basic
> difference between determination and resolution in Marx.

How are you using this expression "Neo-Ricardian" here?  I suspect that Allin would not agree that he is a "Neo-Ricardian", i.e. that he is an advocate of a "surplus approach" perspective. 

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Alejandro Ramos: "[OPE-L:4466] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
Previous message: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari: "[OPE-L:4464] Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
Next in thread: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:4467] Re: Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Reply: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:4467] Re: Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Reply: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari: "[OPE-L:4471] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 00:00:04 EST