[OPE-L:4467] Re: Who are the Neo-Ricardians?

From: Allin Cottrell (cottrell@wfu.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 14:05:33 EST

Next message: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:4468] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
Previous message: Alejandro Ramos: "[OPE-L:4466] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
In reply to: glevy@pratt.edu: "[OPE-L:4465] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari: "[OPE-L:4471] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 glevy@pratt.edu wrote:

> Rakesh wrote in [OPE-L:4464]:
>
> > Though a neo Ricardian, Allin does not understand this basic
> > difference between determination and resolution in Marx.
>
> How are you using this expression "Neo-Ricardian" here?  I
> suspect that Allin would not agree that he is a
> "Neo-Ricardian", i.e. that he is an advocate of a "surplus
> approach" perspective.

Thanks, Jerry.  True enough: I don't mind the label "Ricardian"
in some respects, but I'm not a Neo-Ricardian.

Allin.

Next message: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:4468] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
Previous message: Alejandro Ramos: "[OPE-L:4466] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: what is Volume 1 about?"
In reply to: glevy@pratt.edu: "[OPE-L:4465] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Next in thread: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari: "[OPE-L:4471] Who are the Neo-Ricardians?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 00:00:04 EST