Rakesh Narpat Bhandari wrote: > in 5541 Ajit says of what he calls the traditional interpretation: > > > > >Secondly, this approach must explain how does it take the total > >social labor as > >*given* that is supposedly distributed. > > Ajit, would you kindly elaborate on exactly what this explanatory burden is? > Nice to have you back. > Rakesh ____________________ Well, the question is: is there something given to you (in this case abstract social labor) before you distribute it. If so, then where does this come from and how do you know how much of its quantity there is. If not, then does the distribution of this thing affect its total quantity. In what way the total quantity and its distribution are related to each other? Cheers, ajit sinha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 00:00:07 EDT