ope-l-0105
By Author

Starting: Tue May 01 2001 - 08:02:47 EDT
Ending: Thu May 31 2001 - 23:57:19 EDT

• Ajit Sinha
  • [OPE-L:5696] Re: Re: uzzle & game (re VFT) (Thu May 31 2001 - 06:07:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5688] Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Wed May 30 2001 - 02:26:49 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5680] Re: Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Tue May 29 2001 - 07:04:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5674] Re: Re: Reduction (hegelians) (Sun May 27 2001 - 04:13:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5661] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Thu May 24 2001 - 00:51:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5653] Re: Re: the division of labor in a dialectical systematic theory of capitalism? (Wed May 23 2001 - 07:30:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5651] Re: Re: the infinite regression critique (Wed May 23 2001 - 07:06:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5640] Re: Re: Re: Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form (Tue May 22 2001 - 10:26:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5641] Re: the division of labor in a dialectical systematic theory of capitalism? (Tue May 22 2001 - 10:39:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5632] Re: Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form (Mon May 21 2001 - 02:30:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5609] Re: Re: Re: explanatory power and need for price theory (Thu May 17 2001 - 07:20:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5580] Re: Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Tue May 15 2001 - 01:40:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5565] Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Mon May 14 2001 - 07:19:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5564] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 14 2001 - 07:17:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5558] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 06:57:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5556] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 04:19:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5553] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Sat May 12 2001 - 02:11:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5544] Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 06:05:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5541] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam'sRazor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 01:18:03 EDT)
• Allin Cottrell
  • [OPE-L:5715] Re: Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 23:14:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5713] Re: Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 22:33:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5686] Re: a sail on the horizon (Tue May 29 2001 - 23:51:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5656] Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Wed May 23 2001 - 14:07:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5642] Re: the infinite regression critique (Tue May 22 2001 - 11:32:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5574] Re: Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:12:15 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5572] Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:58:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5563] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 21:21:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5550] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 21:13:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5538] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 16:18:38 EDT)
• Andrew Brown
  • [OPE-L:5633] Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Mon May 21 2001 - 09:06:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5591] Re: explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 09:28:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5586] (Fwd) Re: Re: Re: Ockam's Razor (Wed May 16 2001 - 07:07:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5571] Re: Re: Ockam's Razor (Mon May 14 2001 - 13:26:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5545] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 06:36:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5525] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 08:25:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5514] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 04:25:27 EDT)
• Asfilho@aol.com
  • [OPE-L:5615] Deutscher Prize Nominations (Fri May 18 2001 - 03:42:38 EDT)
• charlie
  • [OPE-L:5702] Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Thu May 31 2001 - 14:27:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5683] Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Tue May 29 2001 - 17:25:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5646] Re: socialist economic policies in transition period (Tue May 22 2001 - 20:11:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5602] Re: Ockam's Razor (Thu May 17 2001 - 00:59:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5495] Re: Counteracting factors (Thu May 03 2001 - 18:50:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5483] Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 18:41:49 EDT)
• Christopher Arthur
  • [OPE-L:5663] Re: Reduction (hegelians) (Fri May 25 2001 - 08:42:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5657] Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Tue May 22 2001 - 19:25:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5623] Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form (Fri May 18 2001 - 12:51:49 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5562] : Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 16:34:43 EDT)
• Fred B. Moseley
  • [OPE-L:5704] Re: Re: total surplus-value in Marx's theory (Thu May 31 2001 - 16:33:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5700] total surplus-value in Marx's theory (Thu May 31 2001 - 11:14:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5699] Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Thu May 31 2001 - 11:11:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5692] Re: Quality-Quantity-Levels (Wed May 30 2001 - 11:20:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5691] Re: Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Wed May 30 2001 - 10:35:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5675] Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Mon May 28 2001 - 10:10:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5664] Re: Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Fri May 25 2001 - 11:33:24 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5643] Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Tue May 22 2001 - 12:13:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5629] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Sun May 20 2001 - 09:39:53 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5624] Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Fri May 18 2001 - 15:08:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5614] Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Thu May 17 2001 - 23:45:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5593] total surplus-value given in Volume 3 (Wed May 16 2001 - 10:29:15 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5569] Re: Ockam's Razor (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:43:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5568] surplus-value change from vol. 1 to vol. 3? (Mon May 14 2001 - 09:41:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5551] Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Fri May 11 2001 - 23:36:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5540] Re: Re: Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Fri May 11 2001 - 00:52:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5529] Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Thu May 10 2001 - 00:45:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5504] Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Sun May 06 2001 - 12:36:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5503] total surplus-value taken as given in Volume 3 (Sun May 06 2001 - 12:15:30 EDT)
• Geert REUTEN
  • [OPE-L:5694] Quality-Quantity-Levels (Wed May 30 2001 - 15:37:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5693] Re: uzzle & game (re VFT) (Wed May 30 2001 - 12:14:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5681] Response to Fred - 1 (Tue May 29 2001 - 11:54:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5669] Quality-Quantity-Levels (Fri May 25 2001 - 21:50:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5598] explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 15:33:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5583] explanatory power (Tue May 15 2001 - 15:39:51 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5576] William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:19:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5577] Ockam's Razor (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:23:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5527] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 22:33:21 EDT)
• Gerald_A_Levy
  • [OPE-L:5711] Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 21:27:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5707] why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 19:26:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5708] Re: Re: Re: de-bunking the de-bunk (Thu May 31 2001 - 19:26:49 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5697] Re: de-bunking the de-bunk (Thu May 31 2001 - 08:25:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5690] the puzzle of capitalism? (re VFT) (Wed May 30 2001 - 09:27:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5684] a sail on the horizon (Tue May 29 2001 - 19:37:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5662] "The Commoner" e-journal (Thu May 24 2001 - 20:41:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5652] Re: socialist economic policies in transition period (Wed May 23 2001 - 07:31:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5647] Re: the division of labor in a dialectical systematic theory of capitalism? (Tue May 22 2001 - 20:23:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5639] the infinite regression critique (Tue May 22 2001 - 08:48:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5634] the division of labor in a dialectical systematic theory of capitalism? (Mon May 21 2001 - 09:22:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5628] capitalism as quantitative? (Sun May 20 2001 - 08:43:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5626] does re-switching actually occur? (Sat May 19 2001 - 08:38:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5620] the role of tautologies in VFT? (Fri May 18 2001 - 08:03:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5619] Re: is value (a form of) labor? (Fri May 18 2001 - 08:03:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5610] Re: Ockam's Razor (Thu May 17 2001 - 08:36:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5599] is value (a form of) labor? (Wed May 16 2001 - 21:44:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5592] Re: Ockam's Razor (Wed May 16 2001 - 10:12:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5588] Re: explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 08:05:53 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5582] which theory has the greater explanatory power? (Tue May 15 2001 - 08:02:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5581] Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Tue May 15 2001 - 06:38:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5567] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:40:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5566] What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Mon May 14 2001 - 08:40:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5559] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 10:18:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5557] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 06:16:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5554] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Sat May 12 2001 - 08:42:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5546] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 08:29:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5537] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 08:28:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5535] Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Thu May 10 2001 - 04:44:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5526] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 17:16:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5518] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 09:19:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5508] Re: Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Mon May 07 2001 - 08:12:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5507] Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Mon May 07 2001 - 08:12:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5502] Re: More Intense Labor (Sat May 05 2001 - 22:32:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5500] William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Sat May 05 2001 - 09:08:45 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5499] Re: More Intense Labor (Fri May 04 2001 - 16:25:57 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5491] Re: Counteracting factors (Thu May 03 2001 - 09:15:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5489] Re: More Intense Labor (Thu May 03 2001 - 05:08:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5490] Re: More Intense Labor (Thu May 03 2001 - 05:08:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5488] price determination by oligopolies (Wed May 02 2001 - 22:25:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5484] Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 20:37:37 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5481] Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 10:00:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5480] Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 04:52:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5475] Re: Counteracting factors (Tue May 01 2001 - 16:52:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5474] absolute surplus value: the nemesis of OPE-L? (Tue May 01 2001 - 12:18:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5473] Re: More Intense Labor (Tue May 01 2001 - 09:31:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5472] May Day political economy controversies (Tue May 01 2001 - 08:05:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5471] Re: More Intense Labor (Tue May 01 2001 - 08:04:16 EDT)
• Gil Skillman
  • [OPE-L:5667] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Fri May 25 2001 - 17:46:41 EDT)
• glevy@pratt.edu
  • [OPE-L:5676] Re: de-bunking the de-bunk (re VFT)? (fwd) (Mon May 28 2001 - 12:57:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5665] de-bunking the de-bunk (re VFT)? (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:53:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5621] Fwd: inégalités sociales en Europe (Fri May 18 2001 - 10:08:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5497] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Fri May 04 2001 - 12:55:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5496] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Fri May 04 2001 - 12:25:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5494] Re: More Intense Labor (Thu May 03 2001 - 15:58:51 EDT)
• howard engelskirchen
  • [OPE-L:5613] Re: is value (a form of) labor? (Thu May 17 2001 - 22:18:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5600] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 16 2001 - 23:03:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5595] Re: Re: explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:27:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5594] Re: Ockam's Razor (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:22:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5579] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 14 2001 - 23:35:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5578] Re: : Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 14 2001 - 18:55:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5539] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 23:09:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5531] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 03:05:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5521] Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 23:52:28 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5512] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 01:12:44 EDT)
• John Ernst
  • [OPE-L:5596] Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Wed May 16 2001 - 11:47:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5575] Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Mon May 14 2001 - 17:04:34 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5573] Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Mon May 14 2001 - 14:43:27 EDT)
• Michael Perelman
  • [OPE-L:5630] Re: capitalism as quantitative? (Sun May 20 2001 - 11:29:16 EDT)
• Michael Williams
  • [OPE-L:5616] RE: Ockam's Razor now becomes value form and labour values (Fri May 18 2001 - 04:39:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5605] RE: Re: Ockam's Razor (Thu May 17 2001 - 05:35:15 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5604] RE: Re: Re: Re: explanatory power (Thu May 17 2001 - 05:35:13 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5603] RE: Ockam's Razor (Thu May 17 2001 - 05:35:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5543] RE: RE: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 04:35:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5523] RE: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 06:16:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5517] RE: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 05:50:17 EDT)
• mongiovg
  • [OPE-L:5685] RE: a sail on the horizon (Tue May 29 2001 - 20:04:28 EDT)
• nicola taylor
  • [OPE-L:5695] Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Wed May 30 2001 - 21:05:46 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5679] Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Tue May 29 2001 - 05:39:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5673] Response to Fred - 1 (Sun May 27 2001 - 01:27:08 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5672] Response to Fred - 4 (Sun May 27 2001 - 01:23:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5671] Response to Fred - 3 (Sun May 27 2001 - 01:17:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5670] Response to Fred - 2 (Sun May 27 2001 - 01:15:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5635] Re: capitalism as quantitative? (Mon May 21 2001 - 09:36:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5631] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Sun May 20 2001 - 11:36:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5625] Re: Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Sat May 19 2001 - 01:34:22 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5617] Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Fri May 18 2001 - 04:24:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5601] Re: Re: Re: explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 23:47:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5585] Re: explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 02:22:24 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5548] Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 11:12:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5528] Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 23:23:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5520] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 22:19:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5513] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 03:28:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5487] Re: Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 22:07:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5479] Re: Re: Re: Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 02:21:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5478] Re: May Day political economy controversies (Wed May 02 2001 - 02:17:53 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5476] Re: Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 01:55:49 EDT)
• Paul
  • [OPE-L:5644] Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Sat May 19 2001 - 16:31:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5645] socialist economic policies in transition period (Tue May 22 2001 - 16:24:53 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5561] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 18:09:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5510] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 07 2001 - 16:48:36 EDT)
• paul bullock
  • [OPE-L:5636] Re: Re: Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form (Mon May 21 2001 - 13:21:12 EDT)
• Paul Cockshott
  • [OPE-L:5650] Re: Re: socialist economic policies in transition period (Wed May 23 2001 - 06:27:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5618] Re: Re: Re: Re: explanatory power and need for price theory (Fri May 18 2001 - 04:38:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5612] Re: Re: Ockam's Razor (Thu May 17 2001 - 09:31:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5608] Re: Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Thu May 17 2001 - 05:58:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5607] Re: Re: Ockam's Razor (Thu May 17 2001 - 05:54:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5606] Re: Re: explanatory power and need for price theory (Thu May 17 2001 - 05:36:24 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5590] Re: Re: explanatory power (Wed May 16 2001 - 08:20:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5589] Re: Ockam's Razor (Wed May 16 2001 - 08:09:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5587] Re: Re: What is the effect of changes in Dept IIb/III? (Wed May 16 2001 - 07:12:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5536] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 07:53:43 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5533] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 05:02:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5524] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 04:36:42 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5516] Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 05:02:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5515] Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 04:54:10 EDT)
• Rakesh Narpat Bhandari
  • [OPE-L:5716] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 23:57:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5714] Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 22:43:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5712] Re: Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 21:59:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5710] Re: why are we on this list? (Thu May 31 2001 - 20:13:50 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5706] Re: Re: Re: total surplus-value in Marx's theory (Thu May 31 2001 - 18:04:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5705] Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Thu May 31 2001 - 18:00:18 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5703] Re: Re: Re: de-bunking the de-bunk (Thu May 31 2001 - 15:01:23 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5701] Re: total surplus-value in Marx's theory (Thu May 31 2001 - 13:21:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5689] Re: a sail on the horizon (Wed May 30 2001 - 04:59:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5682] Re: Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Tue May 29 2001 - 13:57:34 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5678] Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Mon May 28 2001 - 19:33:11 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5677] Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 (Mon May 28 2001 - 13:18:48 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5668] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Fri May 25 2001 - 20:52:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5666] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Fri May 25 2001 - 12:57:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5658] Re: Re: Re: Marx's theory as a quantitative theory (Wed May 23 2001 - 16:43:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5655] Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Wed May 23 2001 - 11:49:26 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5649] Re: Reduction (Wed May 23 2001 - 02:29:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5638] Re: the division of labor in a dialectical systematic theory of capitalism? (Tue May 22 2001 - 04:23:20 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5637] Re: Re: Re: Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form (Mon May 21 2001 - 14:52:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5597] Re: Re: Ockam's Razor (Wed May 16 2001 - 15:41:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5584] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 15 2001 - 20:29:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5570] Re: surplus-value change from vol. 1 to vol. 3? (Mon May 14 2001 - 12:15:31 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5560] William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Sun May 13 2001 - 12:46:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5555] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy (Sat May 12 2001 - 12:31:33 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5552] Re: Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Sat May 12 2001 - 00:16:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5549] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam'sRazor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 11:33:16 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5547] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Fri May 11 2001 - 11:25:25 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5542] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Fri May 11 2001 - 03:47:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5532] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Thu May 10 2001 - 05:16:35 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5530] Re: Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Thu May 10 2001 - 02:05:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5522] Re: Re: Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Wed May 09 2001 - 01:34:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5519] Re: Re: William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Tue May 08 2001 - 16:09:14 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5511] William of Ockam's Razor and Political Economy (Mon May 07 2001 - 21:41:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5509] Re: Re: Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Mon May 07 2001 - 12:28:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5506] Re: total surplus-value taken as given in Volume 3 (Sun May 06 2001 - 14:11:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5505] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Sun May 06 2001 - 13:54:12 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5501] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Sat May 05 2001 - 13:19:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5498] Re: Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Fri May 04 2001 - 15:44:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5493] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Thu May 03 2001 - 12:02:18 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5492] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Thu May 03 2001 - 12:02:03 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5486] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Wed May 02 2001 - 21:47:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5485] Re: Re: More Intense Labor (Wed May 02 2001 - 21:46:55 EDT)
• riccardo bellofiore
  • [OPE-L:5627] European research project on inequalities: rtf files (Sun May 20 2001 - 03:05:30 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5622] Re: Fwd: inégalités sociales en Europe (Fri May 18 2001 - 10:23:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5611] Re: is value (a form of) labor? (Thu May 17 2001 - 07:58:55 EDT)
• Steve Keen
  • [OPE-L:5709] Re: Re: Re: Re: de-bunking the de-bunk (Thu May 31 2001 - 19:22:38 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5698] Re: Re: de-bunking the de-bunk (Thu May 31 2001 - 08:51:47 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5687] Re: a sail on the horizon (Wed May 30 2001 - 00:13:39 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5660] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Wed May 23 2001 - 20:34:17 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5659] Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction (Wed May 23 2001 - 20:18:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5654] Re: Re: Reduction (Wed May 23 2001 - 10:09:10 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5648] Reduction (Tue May 22 2001 - 23:37:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5534] Re: Re: Re: Re: the assumptions necessary for the two equalities to hold? (Thu May 10 2001 - 07:02:06 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5482] Re: Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 16:08:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5477] Re: Re: Re: Counteracting factors (Wed May 02 2001 - 02:14:52 EDT)

Last message date: Thu May 31 2001 - 23:57:19 EDT
Archived on: Sat Jun 02 2001 - 00:00:10 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 00:00:10 EDT