Re Ajit's [5556]: I'm not sure *whom* you are really taking issue with. I thought I knew when you referred in the original [5553] to the 'traditional interpretation'. Yet, in this post you seem to take issue with Rakesh's perspective which you imply is 'Marxist- Hegelian' and value-form theory (VFT). However, Rakesh is not a Heglian by any stretch of the imagination and he has indeed authored long anti-Hegel(ian) posts on this list (he thinks that Marx's methodology has more in common with Aristotle than Marx.) And, VFT (which RB is certainly not part of) can in no meaningful sense be identified as 'traditional'. Consequently, I have a basic, straight-forward and simple question which I trust can be answered simply: what authors (and writings?) have put forward the 'traditional interpretation' that you are taking issue with? In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 00:00:07 EDT