[OPE-L:5849] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour

From: Andrew Brown (Andrew@lubs.leeds.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Jun 10 2001 - 12:57:01 EDT 

Another correction:

On 9 Jun 2001, at 16:50, Andrew Brown wrote:

> I think 'entity' is too stong. But if we 
> substitute 'aspect' for 'entity'  I would go along with what you say. Ie.
> abstract labour are distinct aspects of value (and hence
> 'distinguishable').

The last sentence should read, 'Ie. abstract labour and money are 
distinct aspects of value (and hence 'distinguishable')'

Andy

PS this is one example of what Murray would call 'a distinction of 
reason'

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 10:56:29 EDT