Yes, I meant I have a different point of view from the typical Southerner, not a different point of view from you. I am sure we agree on this issue. Comradely, Fred On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Patrick L. Mason wrote: > Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 09:42:58 -0500 > From: Patrick L. Mason <pmason@garnet.acns.fsu.edu> > Reply-To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu > To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu > Subject: [OPE-L:6130] Re: Re: Re: possible ways out of the 'crisis'? > > > Fred: > > Thanks for your postings with actual data. The numbers help clarify things. > I'll respond in a bit. > > As a fellow Southerner, I, too, do not think that it is a good thing that > America has been Southernized!!! > > I was merely point out that the political economic ideology and theology of > the South has now become over-arching framework for all American political > rhetoric and public policy. > > peace, patrick > > > At 01:19 AM 11/1/01 -0500, you wrote: > > >On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Patrick L. Mason wrote: > > > > > Jerry: > > > > > > Conservatives really aren't interested in whether tax cuts generate jobs. > > > The supply-side language accompanying these cuts is just political filler, > > > spin control, unadulterated garbage. Rather, the real objective is the > > > libertarian desire to reduce the size of government, to reduce government > > > spending and transfer payments purely for the sake of reducing government > > > spending and transfer payments. Lowering tax revenues creates a budget > > > deficit that conservatives then argue can only be solved by lowering > > > spending. The net impact is to redistribute income toward the wealthy. > > > > > > America has been Southernized. > > > >Which is really too bad, and I speak as one from the South, but with a > >different point of view. > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Dec 02 2001 - 00:00:05 EST