Gary and Patrick: It seems to me you both are interested parts in this conflict given your relation with URPE and RRPE. This is not a mere "legal conflict" because at its *origin* there is a matter of the rejection of a paper by an ed board of the RRPE, right? It really doesn't speak well of the state of the US left that something like this had ended in the legal instances, but this is another matter. But more generally, as far as I understand, in this list there is no censorship. So any subscriber can discuss whatever issue she or he wants, no matter if it is "a legal conflict", the situation in Argentina, the methods for solving differential equations, the status of Marx's "law of value", or the weather in Belize City. Patrick's post, supported by Mongiovi, can be effectively read as proposing a kind of censorship here, something, I'm sure, it won't happen. The circulation of information cannot harm anyone. A. At 13:52 15/02/02 -0500, you wrote: >I agree as well, > > >Gary > >-----Original Message----- >From: Patrick L. Mason [SMTP:pmason@garnet.acns.fsu.edu] >Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:47 PM >To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu >Subject: [OPE-L:6591] Re: RE: [Andrew Kliman] Open Letter to OPE-L > > > >Jerry: > >I'm in agreement with Michael Williams. OPE-L should not be used to forward >messages concerning legal conflicts, or resolutions of legal conflicts, or >celebrations of legal conflicts between Andrew Kliman and the Editorial >Board of URPE. > >peace, patrick l mason > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 00:00:05 EST