Re Tony's [6641]:
> Our hope is to develop a collection on Volume I to go along
> with the ones on II and III. Then maybe we can turn to the
> "continuation of capital."
--------------------------------------------
A couple of questions (for any of the contributors to these
volumes) then:
1) Why did you want to follow the sequence of 2 - 3 - 1 rather
than the more obvious sequence of 1- 2 - 3? Was the reason
for beginning with a volume on 2 because V2 was "certainly ...
the least known [of the 3 volumes of _Capital_, JL] and has
been least studied over the last 50 years" (from Arthur and
Reuten's "Marx's Capital II, The Circulation of Capital: General
Introduction" in Arthur and Reuten ed. _The Circulation of
Capital_, p. 1) or was there some other -- or additional --
reason?
2) After having already published the book on Volume 2 [_The
Circulation of Capital_] what was the thinking behind next
examining and publishing a book on Volume 3 [Campbell
and Reuten _The Culmination of Capital_] rather than
turning to Volume 1?
In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 00:00:05 EST