[OPE-L:6802] Re: Re: Re: Keynes and Kalecki

From: Steve Keen (s.keen@uws.edu.au)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 16:06:30 EST


Read a bit more of the book then Rakesh--and maybe also look at my paper on 
my Marx-Goodwin-Minsky model of the trade cycle at:

http://www.csu.edu.au/ci/vol06/keen/keen.html

Cheers,
Steve
At 05:37 AM 22/03/2002 Friday, you wrote:
>re 6798
>
>>
>>Within the Keynesian system the demand for investment goods does not 
>>derive from the demand for consumption goods. Rather both investment 
>>demand and labor demand are derived demands dependent on the level of 
>>*aggregate* demand.
>>
>>In solidarity, Jerry
>
>
>
>What then determines the level of aggregate demand? I think Steve 
>implicitly presents in his interpretation of the Keynesian system the idea 
>that it is determined by the prospects of final consumption.
>
>As a side note,  Bush/Greenspan are attempting to bolster investment 
>demand not so much by strenghtening final demand via direct military 
>purchases and easy consumer credit (which in the US has led to common 
>complaint by progressive economists that the Republicans are more 
>Keynesian than the Democrats) but rather by brightening the prospects of 
>long term profitability through, for example, lax anti trust law, union 
>busting activity by the National Labor Relations Board,  and regressive 
>tax cuts that will require much deeper slashes in the social wage than to 
>which Bush and Greenspan are admitting.
>
>Krugman has railed against the massive regressive tax cuts because of the 
>pressure presumably put on the long bond by the prospect of huge future 
>federal government deficits,  not because of how such cuts in the social 
>wage by dimming the prospects of future demand for consumption goods 
>reduce demand for investment goods in the present.
>
>Bush is in fact attempting to ensure that direct and social wages will not 
>keep pace with productivity gains in his attempt to revive investment demand.
>
>Steve's Keynes seems to be an underconsumptionist but underconsumptionism 
>fails to explain the downturn in investment demand--there had been no 
>prior problem in the realization of surplus value--and more importantly 
>the steps that are taken to revive investment demand.
>
>Rakesh
>

Home Page: http://www.debunking-economics.com
             http://bus.uws.edu.au/steve-keen/
             http://www.stevekeen.net
Dr. Steve Keen
Associate Professor of Economics & Finance
School of Economics and Finance
Campbelltown Campus, Building 11 Room 30,
UNIVERSITY WESTERN SYDNEY
LOCKED BAG 1797
PENRITH SOUTH DC NSW 1797
Australia
s.keen@uws.edu.au 61 2 4620-3016 Fax 61 2 4626-6683
Home 02 9580-4663 Mobile 0409 716 088



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 00:00:06 EST