[OPE-L:8533] Re: Re: Re: A possible reason why profit rates do not equalise--belated comment

From: Christopher Arthur (cjarthur@waitrose.com)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 08:46:16 EST

• Next message: rakeshb@stanford.edu: "[OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones"
• Previous message: OPE-L Administrator: "[OPE-L:8532] Dimitri Dimoulis"
• Next in thread: rakeshb@stanford.edu: "[OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones"
• Reply: rakeshb@stanford.edu: "[OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones"
• Reply: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8540] Re: A possible reason why profit rates do not equalise--belated comment"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

IMHO the assumption (not law) of equal rates of exploitation and the
assumption (not law) of equal profit rates are entirely theoretically
justified by the need to isolate the effect of different determinants. What
happens to these rates empirically is another question.
Chris

17 Bristol Road, Brighton, BN2 1AP, England

• Next message: rakeshb@stanford.edu: "[OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones"
• Previous message: OPE-L Administrator: "[OPE-L:8532] Dimitri Dimoulis"
• Next in thread: rakeshb@stanford.edu: "[OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones"
• Reply: rakeshb@stanford.edu: "[OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones"
• Reply: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8540] Re: A possible reason why profit rates do not equalise--belated comment"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 04 2003 - 00:00:01 EST