From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 11:52:18 EDT
Paul Z wrote on May 23: >> Value is first identified with exchange value, ... > But neither Rubin nor Laibman do this. See: > Rubin, I. I. 1927, "Abstract Labor and Value in Marx's System", > translated by K. Gilbert, Capital and Class, Volume 5, Summer 1978, pp. > 107-139. > Kliman, A. J. 2000, Marx's Concept of Intrinsic Value", Historical > Materialism, No. 6, pp. 89-113. Did you mean to write "neither Rubin nor Laibman nor Kliman" or when you wrote 'Laibman' was that a typo and did you intend to write 'Kliman'? I don't recall, off-hand, the title of the paper by David L that included a critique of other interpretations, including VFT and the TSSI, but I recall that it was presented at a IWGVT a few years ago -- although it's not at the IWGVT web site, I believe. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 24 2003 - 00:00:01 EDT