From: Rakesh Bhandari (rakeshb@STANFORD.EDU)
Date: Sat Sep 27 2003 - 13:59:45 EDT
> > > >> Or, to put it another way: I find the cramped, narrow horizon > > of this list so depressing. Let's see: I submit a post with the title of this subject line about the latest research on the comparison of Jiangnan and England in the 18th century and the exploitation of Africans in the early modern Atlantic trading system and Eldred insults me for my cramped, narrow horizons. Or was it Eldred's own that he feared facing? What should this list be discussing--Heidegger's appropriation of the ancient Greeks, misreadings of Eliot, or idiosyncratic interpretations of Decartes? Why bother with histories of modes of production, what Andrew Levine would call the natural kinds in Marx's theory of history? Or new work on Marx's theory of money? Rakesh
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 29 2003 - 00:00:01 EDT