From: Francisco Paulo Cipolla (cipolla@UFPR.BR)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 14:44:54 EDT
I do not recall whether or not this question has appeared before on OPE-L nor do I know whether all of our colleagues on the list are aware. Chapter 3, vol III,( international publishers´edition 1967, pgs. 49-69) deals with "The relation of the rate of profit to the rate of surplus value". The chapter is divided under two main headings: I. s´ constante and II. s´ variable. Under the second heading there are three subcases. My question is this: Why is that Marx does not consider the possibility of v being constant and C (total capital) being variable? This case is just not discussed at all. What happened? Did he forget? Paulo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 17 2003 - 00:00:01 EDT