From: Philip Dunn (pscumnud@DIRCON.CO.UK)
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 05:56:12 EST
Quoting gerald_a_levy <gerald_a_levy@MSN.COM>: > Phil wrote: > > > To measure the natural price markup we use wage data. We > > use real wages -- the average hourly wage is equal to 1. Then we > > recalculate each firm's wage bill using not the actual wage paid to > > each worker, but the economy-wide average wage paid for each type of > > skill. Since these economy-wide averages will be statistically > > independent, the recalculated real wage bill will be immunized > > against market noise. The greater the number of different skills > > used by the firm the better this works. <snip> > > It does need a breakdown into different skill groups, as finely as > > possible. Also it would be desirable to break down the firm's > > wage bill into parts corresponding to joint products and then break > > those down into skill groups. This would pitch things > > at the level of the valorization process for each joint product. > > Wouldn't the wage bill have to be divided into wages for two distinct > groups -- wages for productive workers and wages for unproductive > workers? If one is trying to determine the 'R-potential for value-creating > labor activity', isn't that a necessary step -- even if it is an additional > complication? > Hi Jerry Yes. it is certainly necessary to make the distinction between productive and unproductive labour. But I look at all private sector labour as productive. Whereever there is profit there is productive labour. So checkout workers in the supermarket are productive, as are banking workers, lawyers, passenger transport workers, etc. Also marketing and advertising expenses are genuine productive costs and not to be paid for out of profit. I would regard the whole waged workforce of a firm as productive too. Clearly, payment by stock options would be an exception, I think. A lot of confusion over productive labour seems to be due to thinking that there is a need for a physical use-value to be produced. There does not seem to be one in banking, say. But I would see the ordinary busines of banking as the joint production of two services: providing willing lenders for borrowers and reliable borrowers for lenders. Phil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 00:00:00 EST