From: Ernesto Screpanti (screpanti@UNISI.IT)
Date: Sat Feb 28 2004 - 04:42:34 EST
At 23.55 19/02/2004 -0800, you wrote: >"I do not agree with either the orthodox theory or >Screpanti's, but that is irrelevant. It is the charge >of incoherence that -I would guess- would attract the >'Damned Lies' bit." > >Oh! I had not seen this one and I'm not sure who wrote >this. It could well be a good joke. Coherence is the >last thing one can find in the TSS approach to Marx or >for that matter anything. It is laughable that the >author of the above quote thinks that such a mild >criticism of an approach deserves to be called "dammed >lies". I think the TSS is not only incoherent but >simply nonsensical! ajit sinha My charge against Charchedi's TSS approach was twofold: Inconsistency: he uses Marx's reproduction conditions but then determines prices without respecting these conditions; dogmatism: Marx (as he interprets him) is always right. Thus I understand that he who disagrees says "damned lies". In solidarity Ernesto >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. >http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 29 2004 - 00:00:02 EST