Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?

From: ajit sinha (sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Fri Feb 20 2004 - 02:55:28 EST

Next message: Gerald A. Levy: "(OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order"
Previous message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order"
In reply to: Gary Mongiovi: "Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?"
Next in thread: Ernesto Screpanti: "Carchedi's TSS approach"
Reply: Ernesto Screpanti: "Carchedi's TSS approach"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"I do not agree with either the orthodox theory or
Screpanti's, but that is irrelevant.  It is the charge
of incoherence that -I would guess-  would attract the
'Damned Lies' bit."

Oh! I had not seen this one and I'm not sure who wrote
this. It could well be a good joke. Coherence is the
last thing one can find in the TSS approach to Marx or
for that matter anything. It is laughable that the
author of the above quote thinks that such a mild
criticism of an approach deserves to be called "dammed
lies". I think the TSS is not only incoherent but
simply nonsensical! ajit sinha

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

Next message: Gerald A. Levy: "(OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order"
Previous message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: (OPE-L) RE: logical order and historical order"
In reply to: Gary Mongiovi: "Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?"
Next in thread: Ernesto Screpanti: "Carchedi's TSS approach"
Reply: Ernesto Screpanti: "Carchedi's TSS approach"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 29 2004 - 00:00:02 EST