From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Fri Apr 23 2004 - 12:45:54 EDT
Good question. Maybe I'll know within the next half-decade. Paul --On Friday, April 23, 2004 12:39 PM -0400 glevy@PRATT.EDU wrote: >> My definition, drawn from the conclusion of my 2000 >> article is "accumulation of capital is increase of wage-labor with its >> associated constant capital". > > Hi Paul Z. > > So, using that definition, if c and v both go up but the increase > in v isn't associated with an increase in [productive] wage-labor, > then that will _not_ be capital accumulation. But, what is it -- > from your perspective -- then? > > In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 24 2004 - 00:00:02 EDT