Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Fri Apr 23 2004 - 12:39:54 EDT

Next message: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Previous message: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Reply: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>  My definition, drawn from the conclusion of my 2000
> article is "accumulation of capital is increase of wage-labor with its
> associated constant capital".

Hi Paul Z.

So,  using that definition, if c and v both go up but the increase
in v isn't associated with an increase in [productive] wage-labor,
then that will _not_ be capital accumulation.  But, what is it --
from your perspective -- then?

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Previous message: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Reply: Paul Zarembka: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 24 2004 - 00:00:02 EDT