From: clyder@GN.APC.ORG
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:25:13 EDT
Quoting ajit sinha <sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM>: > --- Riccardo Bellofiore <riccardo.bellofiore@UNIBG.IT> > wrote: > > About the MEL, I am satisfied with Foley. > __________________ > > But Foley's position contradicts yours and Rakesh's > and others. Foley simply adds up various kinds of > concrete labors such as the labor of carpenters and > masons etc. to get his total direct labor, which is > what he places against the total money value of the > net output to derive the labor value of one unit of > money. It does not solve your problem of abstract > labor since the value of the money commodity is simply > based on adding up concrete labors. So I think you > need to rethink on this problem. Cheers, ajit sinha > __________________ > Surely by adding them up one abstracts from their concrete type, and adds up all that remains - expenditure of human time. > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. > http://messenger.yahoo.com/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT