From: ajit sinha (sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 08:13:56 EDT
--- Riccardo Bellofiore <riccardo.bellofiore@UNIBG.IT> wrote: > About the MEL, I am satisfied with Foley. __________________ But Foley's position contradicts yours and Rakesh's and others. Foley simply adds up various kinds of concrete labors such as the labor of carpenters and masons etc. to get his total direct labor, which is what he places against the total money value of the net output to derive the labor value of one unit of money. It does not solve your problem of abstract labor since the value of the money commodity is simply based on adding up concrete labors. So I think you need to rethink on this problem. Cheers, ajit sinha __________________ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 03 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT