Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence

From: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM
Date: Fri Jan 21 2005 - 10:39:59 EST

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Hume"
Previous message: OPE-L Administrator: "[OPE-L] missing posts?"
In reply to: Hanno Pahl: "Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence"
Next in thread: Hanno Pahl: "Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence"
Reply: Hanno Pahl: "Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> My interest in these things comes from my PhD-thesis, because here I
compare
> the Marxian conception of economy with those conception found in Niklas
> Luhmanns theory of social systems (which is quite popular here in
Germany).

Hanno:

Are you familiar with what  Heiner Ganssmann, a former OPE-L member,
wrote about Luhmann on "Double Contingency" (go to his homepage
http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~ganssman/ and you will find DC in the section
on 'downloads'). [NB: the topic of double contingency seems related to
issues raised in the thread on "Hume", imo.]

Note also the other articles in that section including the short one on
"Capitalism" and the 2004 "What is wrong with the German economy?".

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] Hume"
Previous message: OPE-L Administrator: "[OPE-L] missing posts?"
In reply to: Hanno Pahl: "Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence"
Next in thread: Hanno Pahl: "Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence"
Reply: Hanno Pahl: "Re: [OPE-L] capital in general as a real existence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 22 2005 - 00:00:01 EST