Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?

From: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM
Date: Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:34:39 EDT

Next message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists"
Previous message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists"
Reply: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I think Andy has introduced something tremendously important when he
> emphasises creativity, and it seems to me that this property is
> precisely a forces of production property. Creativity implies
> processes of induction and dynamic change, i.e. innovation, something
> that static approaches do not deal with.

Hi Ian,

Well, if you think it's important to emphasize human creativity ...

I'd be curious to hear what Andy and  you and others on the list
think of the perspectives of Hasan Gurak in "On Value and Price: an
alternative approach to value/price theory":

< http://www.tek.org.tr/tartisma/pdf/Gurak1-Value-Price.pdf >

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists"
Previous message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
In reply to: Ian Wright: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists"
Reply: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "[OPE-L] The Neoclassical Marxists"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 09 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT